Showing posts with label Authors/Artists: Frank Miller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Authors/Artists: Frank Miller. Show all posts

Friday, 12 April 2013

Books: Daredevil: Born Again

_______________________________________________________________________________

Daredevil: Born Again
Written by Frank Miller
Art by David Mazzucchelli
1986




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


I think us comic fans (all the comic fans in the house say "yeah!") can all agree that Batman: Year One is one of the best superhero comics out there. Right guys? I mean - come on: it's got pretty pretty everything - the dark and gritty gloomy atmosphere (that thankfully never skews too dark [1]), a sense of realism that lets you believe in it's premise (without making you realise how gosh-darn silly a man all dressed up like Dracula would be) and a non-stop frantic energy that makes you bounce from page-to-page like a pinball on some kind of unholy mixture of crack coke speed and caffeine [2]: what's not to love?

But for those of those who know - well - they know that before Year One Frank Miller and David Mazzucchelli [3] combined their forces to create a comic that's still rated as one of the best Daredevil stories ever (I realise that that sounds like I'm damning with faint praise - but it's not supposed to: I mean - come on: if you know where to look there are a lot of great Daredevil stories out there - most especially in Brian Michael Bendis' 2001 - 2006 run: which always manages to go out like extra delicious hot cakes when I get them for the Comic Forum meetings....). The late 1980s was a period when a lot of classic epoch-defining comics came out which ended up changing everything for ever (or whatever) but (sadly) one of the inevitable   consequences of all the big love going to the smash-hitters is that - well yeah: there's a few other books that came out at the same time that kinda of got left in the shade a little.

Of course the end of that thought is that Daredevil: Born Again is one of those unsung masterpieces (or - well - unsung in comparison to blah) but - well - the truth is a little bit more tricky than that (damn it).

If I was only going to use one word to describe it then that word would be: immense. Not so much because it has big gigantic spaceships or world-smashing machines or anything like that - no, no, no. This isn't Jack Kirby or Grant Morrison or whatever: nah - the immensity here is of the emotional sort: it's taking your operatic mainstays like: doomed love, existential depression, thwarted something-or-other (thwarted anger? thwarted chances? I dunno -but thwarted is such a good word so - what-the-hey) and - most especially - consuming, all-enveloping, life-defining revenge.

The old Klingon proverb says that revenge is a dish best served cold [4] but - come on - that's not really much of a recipe is it? (Imagine buying a Delia Smith cookbook and that was the total amount of the instructions you were given: it wouldn't be very helpful now - would it?). Thankfully in Born Again Frank Miller and David Mazzucchelli present a culinary masterclass in just how to prepare, spice and season one of the best accounts of superhero-flavoured revenge that I think I've ever seen. I mean - I wasn't the one who was eating it: but I could still feel it in my mouth - fizzling on the tip of my tongue.

Skip past reading the introduction (which reads like the person who wrote it swallowed a thesaurus and it keeps returning on him through his fingers) and just jump straight into the hard-boiled (it is Frank Miller after all [5]) beat-down that awaits within: "Winter hit Manhatten like an unwanted relative. Drops in with no warning and seems to stay forever." and stuff like that.

The other thing you should know is that it's very much front-loaded in terms of the goodness: that is to say - that when it starts (and if you're anything like me) the tautness of - well: pretty much everything (if you could pluck a comic: then it feels like this one would ring out like the bottom note on a cello): the plot, the art, the little character moments: it all joins together to make something that makes me crackle with (I dunno how to say this properly) - artistic electricity?

The first four parts especially especially [6] are spell-binding in their comics-style mastery: check the way that Matt Murdock's [7] sleeping body gets smaller and smaller at the start of each chapter or the two-page scene with Ben Urich on the phone. The way that the backround conversations weave into the throughline. That slow zoom in to his face. And the way it ramps up the colours in his face until realism has been left behind and his skin is red and his eyes are yellow: it's cool is what I'm saying. I mean - yeah: ok - it gets laid on a little thickly at points (at one point Matt's superhuman senses are described as: "a great way to catch all the misery of being alive." - which I know is a bit much but (at the same time) is utterly fantastic - no?).

But then: I dunno - (after all that bliss) towards the end: it hits somekind of wall and starts to deflate a little - a trait which it shares with Batman: Year One (and which I put down to the limits of trying to write something that feels complete within the limits of a franchise where nothing is ever really allowed to change too much [9]  ): I mean - I can see that Frank Miller is trying to write about something about the misuses of patriotism (or something): but the problem is that Matt Murdoch's struggle kinda of gets lost underneath: plus (for me) there's only so many scenes I can take of the Kingpin [10] being mean to his underlings before it all starts to feel a little bit like Dr Evil [11]: but what the hey - it's a fun ride while it lasts.  

.......................................................................................................................................................
[1] By which - of course I mean - no one gets raped (for those of you that don't know: having someone rape one of your (female) characters was the default option of choice for superhero comics searching for some sort of prestige back in the late 80s and early 90s: because that's the one thing that made Watchmen so great -obviously: and hey (by the same logic) - if you get a mop-top haircut then - yes - you too can be as big as the Beatles).

[2] Yeah - ok: so I googled "drug that makes you jittery." Leave me alone.

[3] Frank Miller on the final page writes: "It's almost criminal how easy David makes it to write a script. He makes a three-dimensional stage of the individual panel, complete in authentic detail, nonetheless uncluttered and utterly readable. He creates actors whose dramatic range is startling, whose best and most compelling moments are wordless. He's talking of writing his own comics. Keep an eye out for them. I will." Little did anyone know but it took over twenty years (!) before David came out with his own book: Asterios Polyp (which you should check out if you haven't already).

[4] "It is very cold in space."

[5] And I bet I know how he likes his eggs.

[6] And just check out the names! Part one: Apocalypse. Part two: Purgatory. Part three: Pariah! (and that exclamination mark is theirs not mine: so you know they're serious business - right? Right).

[7] I'm sure that someone else out there has already pointed this out - but still - isn't it funny how there's this split between superheroes who you (mostly) think of by their superhero names: Superman is mostly referred to as Superman, Batman is Batman, Wonder Woman is Wonder Woman etc: and then there's the slightly lower tier of costumed do-gooders who foreground the human over the super: Peter Parker probably being the most well-known example: where the drama (mostly) comes from the trials and tribulations suffered by the hero when he's not wearing his spandex. Well (in case you didn't know): if you're talking about the comic Daredevil: you're going to find yourself thinking about and referring to "Matt Murdock" an awful lot more than you will "Daredevil" mainly (I guess) because as a rooftop super-ninja vigilante dressing up in a leather devil-horned outfit he's pretty much invincible ("The one relief i can give myself when... it all gets to be too much." [8]) - but as a blind lawyer with a string of ex-girlfriends: well - he's got more weak points: that's for sure - something which Frank Miller knows how to exploit to the maximum.

[8] The less said about that the better.

[9] And no one can ever die.

[10] I don't know if I'm reaching a bit: but I'd say it's notable that the Kingpin (as Matt Murdock's main bad guy nemesis) isn't some freak in clown make-up or somekind of hideous mutant animal thing: nope - he's just a criminal: "The boss of everything bad that makes money in what must be most of the free world.": but with no real further motivations than to increase his revenue stream (no Pinky and the Brain style: "try to take over the world!" for this guy: he'd much rather just control things from behind the scenes).

[11] And if you read the book I'm sure you'll all know which scene I mean (I think - or maybe it's just me).

.......................................................................................................................................................

Further reading: Daredevil (2001 - 2006), Batman: Year One, Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Elektra: Assassin, Asterios Polyp, The Life and Times of Martha Washington in the Twenty-First Century.

Profiles: Frank Miller.

All comments welcome.

Thursday, 21 February 2013

Books: Spawn

________________________________________________________________________________

Spawn
By Todd McFarlane
2006





Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


If I could I would make it so that as soon as you started reading this review you would hear the chug-chug-chugging of some mid-90s heavy-metal guitars [1]. You know - some Rage Against The Machine maybe or hell: anything off the soundtrack that came out with the 1997 Spawn film [2]: because - well - yeah: Spawn all the way from his name [3] all the way to his garish, chains and red cape outfit [4] is the absolute embodiment of 90s superhero excess: and depending on your tastes - that means that he's like: total the worst thing ever - or the best thing since Pop Tarts [5].

When I saw it sitting on the shelves of Central Library: my first reaction was a stupid grin - I mean - I may as well just admit it and get it out of the way: for a few issues at least [6] I was a teenage Spawn reader. I don't know if this was just somesort of pack instinct or silly gullibility or (maybe) the fact that (at the time) the thought of a superhero from Hell with magical green powers was just the most awesome thing I had ever heard of: but - well - there it is: I'm not proud [7].

Revisiting one of the bastions of my teenage years I was expecting nothing more than a bit of a larky, giggly laugh: like flipping through old photos and marvelling at the way you used to wear your hair. But of course things are never that simple - especially when you get Frank Miller to write your introduction.

I mean: when I first saw his name I was a little shocked: it was (a bit) like seeing Thom Yorke introducing Marilyn Manson (or something: I dunno - maybe make up your own analogy of respected industry figure acting as a host for some cheesy bubblegum nonsense [9]): but then he starts putting things in context and making grand proclamations like: "Spawn in a chunk of comics history and an important one. Spawn is a Boston Tea Party, a loud rude act of defiance against a bad, broken system built on abusing it's finest." Which made me go - oh: wow - ok: yeah: comics history and DC and Marvel screwing over creators and etc - and yeah: I guess it is good that finally someone could create a superhero and own all the rights to it and stuff [10]: but well - that Hunter S. Thompson quote from Fear and Loathing Las Vegas springs to mind [11] while it might have seemed like the start of some Brave New Dawn all the way back in 1992 or whatever: but with over twenty years hindsight - things look a lot less rosey: the bad news is that DC and Marvel still rule the comics market with an iron fist and - well: that market has now shrunk down to almost nothing (or is that just me? I dunno...). Reading the Frank Miller introduction is like looking back at the early stages of a gold rush where - it turned out - there wasn't actually any gold in them there hills: like - it's nice that they were so happy and hopeful - but it's sad that nothing really came of it and that the Boston Tea Partying didn't actually manage to kick-start a revolution after all: and the bad, broken system is still in place today.

Oh well.

On to the comic (which is a bit of a shock after the hallowed tones of the introduction - like - hell: hearing Thom Yorke wax lyrical about the way music can stir the soul and sooth the savage beast: and then having Marilyn Manson come out and do his cover of Tainted Love [12]) and from it's very first lines ("I don't belong. Not here. Not now.") which (is this just me?) reminded me of another popular hit from the early 90s [13] - the whole thing positively reeks of teenage-boy-ness (with that too-much-Lynx smell hanging over every page like a damp cloth): I mean - hell: a hideously scarred outcast that can't communicate his romantic intentions to his beloved: it doesn't take that much for your average hormone-drenched male youth to relate - you know? And with hard boiled dialogue like "Funny how being a walking dead man can screw up your life." existing in the dunderheaded spot between Sin City and - hell - every other superhero comic ever: then - yeah: I can see why it used to appeal to me so much that I paid good money to go and see the movie. All the darkest bits of Batman, Spider-Man and Daredevil all mixed up in a blender and sprinkled with a shot of hell-fire? I mean: reading it now it all seems coldly calculated for the widest possible appeal: but what the hey right? No one is that discerning when they're that young - so what's the harm?

Of course - there are a few things that put it ahead of the curve: one of which I remember appealing to me at the time is that right at the start there's a promise of an expiry date (I'll just say 9999 and leave it at that): I mean - I knew at the time that every superhero comic out there just went on forever and ever and ever: and hell - who wants to be caught in a story that never actually goes anywhere? No thank you: not for me [14]. But Spawn presents itself right from the start as something different as something that seems like it has a finite story to tell: rather than just another never-ending franchise [15].

What else? Well: as you may or may not know: one of the more notable features of Spawn is that for 4 issues (Spawn #8 - #11) Todd McFarlane somehow (my best guess would be: by using loads and loads of money: but whatever) managed to get four of the best comic writers of - like - ever to write a single guest issue of Spawn: Alan Moore, Neil Gaiman, Dave Sim and Frank Miller (which - in case you didn't realise was like a big deal): it would be like if Marilyn Manson had an album which had songs written by - well: hell - you can fill in the rest: you know.

Sadly for whatever reasons [16] the only two stories that appear here are the Alan Moore one and the Frank Miller (strangely tho - although Frank Miller gets credit for his story - I couldn't find Alan Moore's name anywhere in the entire book: which is a little strange - and I had to google the name of the story "In Heaven (Everything is Fine)" just to make sure it was him [17]) and - hell - even if you don't feel like you have any interest in the adventures of Spawn: I would still recommend you trying out the Alan Moore story: it's like an expanded edition of one of his Future Shock stories that he used to write for 2000AD (The Frank Miller story? Meh. That's less good: but then it doesn't really seem like he's really trying that hard - but I guess it's more him bending his approach to Spawn rather than Alan Moore who bends Spawns to meet him).

But yeah: as for the rest: I mean - if you've ever seen Todd McFarlane's artwork anywhere - then you should know what to expect: everyone stands around posing - and there's loads of finickity little details hanging around the place: but the feeling it tends to leave you with is the same one you get after you eat a Big Mac: I mean - yeah: it's kinda tasty: but it's not particularly nourishing - you know?

And - of course: it's doing it's best to keep you hooked: so there's not much closure at the end: just another cliffhanger to try and keep you coming back: although if you don't know your Image Universe that well (like me) then it's not that much of a hook (I thought it was the introduction of a new character - but instead it's someone that you're already supposed to know: oh well).

In conclusion: SPAWN. You already know if you're gonna like it or not - so what more can I say?

....................................................................................................................................................
[1] Like a Myspace page or something: in fact - YES: if I could somehow write this whole thing so that it came up like a Myspace page: that would be absolutely perfect (oh well).

[2] "Spawn: The Album was released in July 1997 and brought together popular rock bands at the time including Metallica, Korn, Slayer, Marilyn Manson and Silverchair with well known DJs and electronic producers such as The Crystal Method, Roni Size, and The Prodigy." So - yeah - something like that.

[3] According to lastfm there's more than one band who go by the name “Spawn.” (a 90s alternative rock band from Buffalo, NY (I mean - obviously) a German straight-edge band, a happy ska-punk band from the Netherlands, a brutal Death Metal band from Germany, a hip-hop MC and a metal band from The Netherlands also from the 90’s). frankly I'm surprised that there aren't more: although I guess that most people would associate Spawn with Frogs rather than Hell - but whatever.

[4] Which - to Todd McFarlane's credit - is delivered a stinging put -down by one of the ever-present TV presenters (who I would say act as Spawn's Greek Chorus - if saying so didn't make me sound like a English literature paper): I thought I wrote it down somewhere - (because it made me chuckle when I read it) - but now I can't find it: oh well - you'll know it when you see it.

[5] Which - ok - were invented in 1964: but for some reason (to me) seem like a 1990s thing. Whatever.

[6] Ok - so maybe more than a few issues: in fact - reading through this Volume a hell of a lot of it seemed very familiar -so I think that I might have got a good 12 issues in before I dropped out (or did they stop publishing them in the UK? I dunno - one of the two anyway....).

[7] In fact - I mean: while we're admitting stuff - I guess I should also 'fess up that on the week it was released me and my sister walked down the Brighton seafront to go to a evening showing of the (aforementioned) Spawn feature film (directed by Mark A.Z. Dippé and starring Michael Jai White: both of whom (according to their wikipedia entries at least) hold up Spawn as their career highlights: so - erm - yes): which - strange (and as sad) as it may seem: is kinda one of my happiest memories from my teenage years: not so much for the film (which I can barely remember [8]) but for the heart-to-heart me and my sister had walking there and back (moral of the story I'd say is that - even if your life is full of trashy junk entertainment: it's still possible to build some pretty beautiful moments round the side of them: or something...).

[8] Ok - fine: I can't remember a single frame. Hell - maybe I fell asleep when I was watching it or something?

[9] And just to be clear: I don't have a problem with cheesy bubblegum nonsense: I just normally expect it to be treated as such. (And of course (as every comic fan should already know) - Frank Miller is - well - gonzo enough (especially in recent years) that I guess I shouldn't be surprised by anything he does: but - you know: the introduction (according to the notes) was written back in the 1990s back when he was still (relatively) sane and known for stuff like Sin City (which is good) rather than stuff like Holy Terror (which is not good)).

[10] Although it should be pointed out that reason that Todd McFarlane could do this is because he did Spider-Man for Marvel and got loads of mainstream love and a massive cult following which he then brought with him when he jumped ship: it's like Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails and whoever selling their albums with a "pay what you like" system: it works for them because they already have a fan-base in place - but for anyone just starting out with superhero comics or making music or whatever - well (massive understatement) - it's a lot harder.

[11] You know the one: "And that, I think, was the handle—that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn't need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting—on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave.… So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark—that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back."

[12] I told you that you should come up with your own analogy because now it looks like this is the one we're stuck with.

[13] Hell - if they ever get around to making another Spawn film: I reckon they should use it as the theme song ("I want a perfect body / I want a perfect soul" etc).

[14] The only other comic that I used to buy every week at that time was 2000AD: and seeing how that was an anthology - it seemed less like something that was trying to cheat you with never-ending formulations on the same basic concept and more like something that had actual stories with beginnings, middles and ends (well - most of the time): and hell - even Judge Dredd got older each year: which just seemed like - I dunno: a much fairer way to treat your readership (or maybe that's just me?).

[15] But - oops (reading the wikipedia page): it turns out that was a lie: "On January 12, 2011, issue #200 completely sold out within that single day. This marks the bicentennial issue of the series and features an all-star creative lineup, including Greg Capullo, David Finch, Michael Golden, Jim Lee, Rob Liefeld, Marc Silvestri, Danny Miki, and Ashley Wood all contributing to the anniversary issue. A second printing was released on February 9, 2011. Despite its remarkable sales, it has endured terrible reception from fans and reviewers alike." (oh dear).

[16] Most probably in Neil Gaiman's case legal ones (see here, here and here for more information if that's what turns you on).

[17] I mean - even tho he does a pretty good Todd McFarlane impression and is only coasting on 10% of his usual 5000 horsepower ways: just from the jump in quality and the power of the ideas: you can still obviously tell that it's someone different at the controls (for whatever reason I'm reminded of that line from The Simpsons: "You wouldn't believe the celebrities who did cameos! Dustin Hoffman, Michael Jackson. Of course, they didn't use their real names, but you could tell it was them.") 

....................................................................................................................................................
Links: Comics Alliance Article: ComicsAlliance Reviews Todd McFarlane's 'Spawn' Year One, Part 1: Questions / Part 2: Justice & Payback / Part Three: Writertown / Part 4: 'Flashback'

Further reading: Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Sin City, Ronin, Heavy Liquid, Elephantmen, The Life and Times of Martha Washington in the Twenty-First Century, The Complete Future Shocks, Prophet.

All comments welcome.

Monday, 16 January 2012

Books: Batman: The Dark Knight Returns

_________________________________________________________________________________

The Dark Knight Returns
Written by Frank Miller
Art by Frank Miller, Klaus Janson and Lynn Varley

1986




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


My mum isn't really a comic's person. I mean - I can't be certain - but I'm guessing that if you said "Watchmen" to her she'd probably think you were talking about those things you strap to your wrist.

But still: I fairly sure that the first time I read The Dark Knight Returns (and there have been many many times since) was because of her. According to my memory - it's a rainy day - I'm stuck indoors (I have no idea how old I am - 8? 12? 16?) and I'm rooting around her bookcase looking for something to distract me: and I'm flicking through - no, no, nothing, rubbish, no, no, no - and I get to the bottom shelf and I see it: a Batman comic? What the...? I take it out and look at the front cover. It's a very cool cover - not the one above [1] - but much starker and much blacker (hell - it is called The Dark Knight): with Batman abstracted to the point where he looks less like a man and more like a giant gothic ornament - standing behind a building with the Bat-signal projected on to it - so that it sits pretty much where his chest-plate should be. It's a very cool cover [2]. And at first I can't get over the fact that my mum has a Batman comic on her shelf - and then I start reading it - "I've got the home stretch all to myself when the readings stop making sense" - and oh my god - Bruce Wayne dies on the first page? What is this? This is like no Batman comic I have ever read.

I mean - of course - at that point it's likely that I'd never even read a Batman comic. But like any child everywhere on the planet - of course I knew who Batman was, what he did, what he stood for (for those of you who don't know thats: Bruce Wayne, dressing up as a giant Bat and fighting crime, and truth, justice and being a total badass): but this - The Dark Knight Returns - it just felt - well - I guess the word I would have used would have been wrong: it was all wrong. In every other Batman story I'd come across (I'm guessing the two main sources at this point would have been the Adam West version and the pure awesomeness of the Batman: Animated Series) there was always a sense that everything was going to be alright - yeah: the Joker or whoever would cause some limited amount of mayhem and a little bit of wanton destruction - but Batman would soon figure out what they were up to and work out a way to stop them: and then everything would be alright. But in this book it felt like all the normal certainties had been taken away. First of all: Batman was old. And even back then I knew that Batman was never supposed to get old - he was supposed to stay in prime, peak-physical fitness for all time so that he was always there to take out the bad-guys: Batman being old? That was as crazy and stupid and as wrong as God getting old [3]. The second thing that was wrong was that - in the Dark Knight Returns - Gotham wasn't right. I mean - yeah - I knew that the city had it's fair share of troubles - all those super-criminals and all - but apart from that normally it was just like any other fictional city: you know - clean and litter-free: like a better version of real life (with the only small hiccup coming from the Animated Series where it seemed to have a strange affliction of only ever existing at night time [4]). But in Frank Miller's hands - Gotham was a decaying shambles falling apart from the seams - with the streets lined up with trash - dead nuns and dead cats - stapled to church doors - and the thought of going out by yourself after dark was practically suicidal. Yeah. Kinda like real life a bit I guess - only ten times worse. And: well - things start off bad and then - instead of Batman swooping in to make things better and doing all his restoring the status-quo-stuff ("And then everything went back to normal") - for the average Gothamite - things just get worse and keep on getting worse [5]: at the start things are just kinda rubbish - but towards the end it's all practically apocalyptic (hell - there's no "practically" about it).

(How have you not read this already? Literally - even my mum has read it). 

Of course - all this "wrongness" is what makes everything about this book so goddamn right [6]. And even reading it as a kid and taking in the transgressiveness of the story - I didn't want to stop reading - hell: it just made me want to read it more: in fact it's what makes it so totally compulsive (again: maybe this is just me sugar-coating the memory - but I'm pretty sure that I once I picked it up and peeked inside - I didn't put it down until I'd read all the way to the end). All the other Batman stories until that point (hell: nearly all the other stories period) are always about playing things safe and acting as reassurance: a safe place where everything is going to be ok and everyone always lives happily ever after [7]. The Dark Knight Returns doesn't care about doing any of that sort of stuff. Bruce Wayne has a death wish right from the get-go and altho it does have a choice selection of Batman bad-guys for him to fight - by the end he's not going up against any one freak in a funny outfit - he's seemingly taking on the whole world in a fight he can't possibly win (can he?): but then - when the narrative safeties are off and the possibility of victory seems impossible (and #1 in Pixar's 22 rules of storytelling [8] is: "You admire a character for trying more than for their successes") there are few things in the world better or more exciting. Insurmountable odds and the very really possibility of failure and death lurking at each step? Bring it on [9]: Has there ever been a Batman more primal than this ("While in my gut the creature writhes and snarls and tells me what I need")? It's less like a comic book like we normally know it (with bright multi-coloured heroes and villains in fabulous-looking costumes) and more like an opera [11]: Extravagantly theatrical, overly dramatic and twice as big as you can possibly imagine. 

When art-forms start out (training wheels firmly attached) they muck around in the shallows for a while and don't try too much - until someone comes along, rolls their sleeves up, pushes it as far as it will go and then blows the whole thing up. That's The Dark Knight Returns. The Big Daddy of all the "dark, grim and gritty" / "serious" / "for mature readers" graphic novels out there - and (along with the aforementioned Watchmen) the prime mover in showing the rest of the world that - Boom! Pow! Bang! - comics weren't just for kids anymore! and could even be - just maybe: quote unquote "Art": It's also one of the most assured, inspired, and - well - hands down best mainstream comic books of all time. Yeah - ok - hyperbole (maybe) but this is a comic full of sophistication, poise and an emotionally damaged billionaire dressing up like a giant bat and going out and kicking ass.

You want to know the story? Well ok: Gotham City (and the world) has gone to hell and "the Batman" is just a legend [12]. Until one day: he's back and - well - everything goes insane - building up towards several end-of-the-world-style showdowns and - hell yeah - the best fight scene in a comic book ever ever ever. Quietly innovative (as strange as it sounds to refer to anything in this book as "quiet" [13]) and totally masterful in it's use of (amongst other things) colour, panel construction and text-boxes - with so so many lovely little touches (amongst which: "Arkham Home for the Emotionally Troubled" is one of my favourites) plus drawn with patience that at points slows down so much that it's like reading individual frames from a roll of film ("You remember that night"). Basically - yeah: it's Frank Miller's magnum opus and a shining exemplar of just how magnificent a comic book can be. It might not be exactly your cup of tea: but there's so much skill/craft/workmanship built into every small facet of it's towering being - that kudos must be given. Or to put it another way (as someone else from the Comic Forum so excellently put it): it's made of awesome.

In fact I'll say it again: How have you not read it already? It's The Dark Knight Returns. It changed the way the world thinks of not just Batman - but the whole medium of comic books (what they are and what they can do): so much so that - damn - like I said: even my mum has a copy. And if you haven't yet had the experience: well... 

.....................................................................................................................................
[1] Designed by Chip Kidd who also did the starey Batman eye cover for the Dark Knight Strikes Back (which I must admit I do quite like) - and who wrote the The Cheese Monkeys (which is quite good and is how I know who he is): plus - he's the guy who's (pretty much) responsible for the Jurassic Park logo - so: yeah (and this too). 

[2] It must be well out of print by now because if you google "dark knight returns cover" it doesn't even show up until the second page (if you're curious you can see it: here).  

[3] There's a quote somewhere from Frank Miller who talked about part of the inspiration for the Dark Knight Returns came when he realised that he was gonne be older than Batman - ah! Here we go: "In Miller's strip Bruce Wayne was a fiftysomething alcoholic, forced out of retirement to clean up a Gotham City abandoned by its government. With the Cold War at full boil and Reagan still president, it was a searing indictment of the times. "Suddenly I realised I was about to turn 30, and Batman was permanently 29," Miller says. "And I was going to be damned if I was older than Batman." No. Wait. Actually (I guess it's a story he's told a few different times) he tells it best in his introduction to the Tenth Anniversary Edition: “1985. My apartment in New York City. A sudden realization, and not a pleasant one. My thirtieth birthday is right around the corner. I’m poised to turn one year older than Batman. I’ve come to accept, in recent years, that Spider-Man is younger than my little brother, but Batman? My favorite childhood hero? That lantern-jawed, ever-wise father figure? I’m actually gonna be older than Batman? This was intolerable. Something had to be done. Later that same year. On board an airplane headed for Texas. Dick Giordano and I sip white wine and talk. Enthusiastically, if clumsily, I lay out to him the collection of ideas I've got for this Batman thing he's wanted me to do. The central notion is simply to move Batman through time, and chronicle his last case. Move him through time, and, just by happenstance, make him once again much older than I am."   

[4] But then - as we all surely know: Batman sure looks stupid when he's around standing around during the daytime. 

[5] Hell yes Godspeed You Black Emperor! = ideal Dark Knight Returns soundtrack. Failing that: the the best thing about the Nolan Batfilms: Hans Zimmer (that's not counting Heath Ledger obviously).

[6] Although - not everything is changed: there are a still few solid dependables - top of the list being Alfred Pennyworth who's never been in better form than he is here ("Hmf ...he'll just have to wear it wet...")

[7] I think that's why all the good horror films tend to mess you up as kid: because not only are they full of crazy monsters and whatever - but nine times out of ten - they don't end with everything being ok (That episode of South Park with the 5 year old with cancer? "No hope. No hope.").

[8] See: here. (also available in Lego form). 

[9] Having an email conversation with my friends about everything that was wrong with The Dark Knight Rises I stumbled upon Die Hard as maybe one of the best and most well-known examples of this: I mean you always know that Die Hard [10] isn't going to die - but the way it's made and the way the story unfolds - you still always feel like (no matter how many times you've seen it) there's the possibility that he just might.  That's called good storytelling. Another thing that Die Hard and The Dark Knight Returns have in common (and that The Dark Knight Rises doesn't do): is that they always have the main character going around and doing actual life-threatening stuff rather than say - just sitting around and flying about in a stupid Batcopter (if all your main action stuff is someone just sitting around pressing buttons - especially if that someone is Batman -then there is something very wrong going on). 

[10] Yes - his name is Die Hard - why? What do you call him? (It's like they say in Peep Show: 'Of course he's called Jaws. "Here comes Jaws, Jaws the shark, mind he doesn't bite you with his enormous jaws.")

[11] Frank Miller in that Tenth Anniversary Edition introduction again: "And there was Batman himself. He was the real boss. As he was quick to assert, Batman has a personality and a purpose all his own, a definable core. He's no whiner ; there's not a trace of self-pity in his soul. He's smart. He's noble. His passions are grand. Even his unhappiness is not depressing, but a brooding, Wagnerian torment. And his triumphs are Olympian."

[12] I don't know if anyone has pointed this out (and probably this is just boring geeky comic talk) - but there's a strange little sliver of precognition embedded within The Dark Knight Returns namely: the reason why Bruce Wayne retired as Batman being that Jason Todd died: "I gave my word. For Jason. Never. Never Again." There's even a little memorial cabinet in the Batcave for his Robin costume that Bruce stands in front of and does his brooding. Of course (yeah) Jason Todd being dead is (at this point) common knowledge amongst all semi-serious Batman fans (let's ignore his subsequent resurrection): he was blown up by the Joker and DC had a telephone poll letting the readers choose if Jason Todd should live or die and he was killed off by a vote of 5343 to 5271 (ouch - harsh) but what of lot of people may not realise nowadays is that The Dark Knight Returns was first published in 1986 while Jason Todd wasn't done away with until 1988. Which means that the gravitational pull of the Dark Knight Returns is so strong that the mainstream DC continuity has been somehow warped into falling in line with it. (Or maybe it's just because Jason Todd was so annoying that Frank Miller realised that it was a no-brainer that at some point they were just gonna have to kill off the little squirt?). [Edit: Oh wait - yeah they mention it in one of those Big Other article below - but - yeah - they make less of a meal out of it].

[13] And if you're looking for a full breakdown of the all the marvelous things it does - then check out the Big Other Articles linked below - they're very good.

.....................................................................................................................................
Links: The M0vie Blog Review, Mindless Ones Analysis, Big Other Analysis of The Dark Knight Returns: Part 1 / Part 2 / Part 3 / Part 4 / Part 5 / Part 6 / Part 7 / Part 8, Comics Alliance Article: Away From Human Memory: Editing And Composition In Frank Miller's 'The Dark Knight Returns'.

Further reading: Watchmen, Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again, Batman: Year One, Batman: All Star Batman and Robin, Ronin, Batman: Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth, 300, Kingdom Come, Batman: Year 100, Supergods, Batman: Knightfall. 

Profiles: Frank Miller.

All comments welcome.

Monday, 9 January 2012

Books: Holy Terror

_________________________________________________________________________________

Holy Terror
By Frank Miller
2011





Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/

I brought back this and Craig Thompson's Habibi back home and - my girlfriend asked what they were: "Well - going by reputation (seeing how I haven't had a chance to read them yet) - this (pointing at Habibi) is the best comic of 2011 and this (pointing at Holy Terror) is the worst comic of 2011." [1]

"Why is Holy Terror the worst comic of 2011?" She said.

"Pick it up. Open the first page. No - next page. One after that. Next page - ah: there you go."

"Ah" she said.

I won't ruin the surprise for you - except to say that there's a quote from the prophet Mohammed and - well - it's not pleasant. And (oh dear) neither is the rest of the book that follows.

Some context may be helpful here. Frank Miller is a guy who has spent a long time writing and drawing comic books: and while most people out there struggle to do one or the other - he does both very very very well. Most people who've heard of him will associate him with The Dark Knight Returns - his big, brooding Batman magnum opus from the mid 1980s. Since then - seemingly everything he's created has been (to lesser and greater extents) been booed and jeered as derided as not being as good... But - well - that's just the price you pay for making a masterpiece - right? And even if there's people out there who still wish Radiohead would make OK Computer Part 2 already - well - doing the same thing over and over and over again isn't really what makes life fun and exciting. And all of the stuff that Frank was making - from his black and white neo-noir Crime stories (Sin City) - to his retelling of the Battle of Thermopylae (300) - and the bonkers manga infused mayhem with Geoff Darrow (Hard Boiled and The Big Guy and Rusty the Boy Robot) - it was all to the good.

But then - in the early 2000s - things seemed to take a turn for the worst. First there was his sequel to The Dark Knight Returns which many dismissed as an empty-hearted cash-making exercise - then came his All Star Batman and Robin with artist Jim Lee which was condemned as blasphemy with it's use of the (now immortal line) "I'm The Goddamn Batman." - and now this: Holy Terror (which reportedly began life as a Dark Knight book back when it went under the slightly longer title of - I kid you not - "Holy Terror Batman"). With each successive stage Frank Miller has lost more and more fans and left the people who defend him with less and less to work with. And I speak as one of those people who have defended him and - yeah damnit - I'd still say that The Dark Knight Returns and All Star Batman and Robin are joyous and exhilarating reading experiences and frankly I feel sorry for those that dismiss them outright. But after reading Holy Terror I realised that I've finally reached my limit - and as much as it pains me: this is my stop and this is where I get off (bye!).

An explanation: when Holy Terror was first announced (way back in 2006) Frank Miller sold it as (and I quote): "a piece of propaganda... Superman punched out Hitler. So did Captain America. That's one of the things they're there for." Which I guess was fair warning for what the finished product was going to be like: a semi-incoherent racist splurge that spews nothing but bile and hatred at the expense of everything: characters, plot and design. Reading it feels like being locked inside a drunk paranoid old man whose last few synapses have long since burnt out and faded away - replaced only with a festering debilitating rage fixated on "evil Muslims." But - hell - maybe that was the point? I don't know. In fact: when the negative reviews first started coming out for Holy Terror (and a quick scan of the web will reveal that there are so so many negative reviews of this book) I thought that maybe people had missed the point and that maybe Frank Miller was fiendishly making some wider satirical point that everyone else was missing. Sadly: that doesn't seem to be the case.

Are there any plus sides? Well. Some of the art at the start is slightly nifty and I'm not to proud to admit that I dug some of the angled silhouettes of the building. But the way everything looked reminded me of Hell and Back - which as anyone will tell you - is the worst of the Sin City books.

In short: It's not only the worst comic of 2011. It's - by a long, long stretch the worst Frank Miller comic ever written. And - hell - for the sheer ugliness that squats at it's dark sunken little heart - one of the worst comics I've ever read.

Sorry Frank.

...................................................................................................................................................
[1] And I'm sure that someone somewhere is already writing a thesis comparing and contrasting both books opposing attitudes to the Islamic faith.

...................................................................................................................................................
Links: Comics Alliance Review, Robot 6 Review, The Tearoom of Despair Review, Warren Peace Sings The Blues Review, Wired Review, Every Day Is Like Wednesday Review, Tor Review, 4th Letter Article: Swing Anna Miss, Big Frank [Holy Terror], Guardian Review.

Further reading: Sin City, 300, The Dark Knight Returns, The Dark Knight Strikes Again, Hard Boiled.

Profiles: Frank Miller.

All comments welcome.

Tuesday, 18 October 2011

Books: Ronin

________________________________________________________________________________

Ronin
By Frank Miller

1984





Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


No. Shut up. Frank Miller is a stone-cold genius. And - damnit - one of the best story-tellers of recent times: (and I'm not just talking about comics). Ok?

(Reaches for the music metaphors) like Bleach was to Nevermind, Definitely Maybe was to What's The Story (Morning Glory) and Spice was to Spiceworld: this (Ronin) is to the ever-so mighty Dark Knight Returns - the plucky, noisey and rowdy predecessor that might not be as poised and polished as what came after: but is still infused with the same golden touch (and - obviously - a small sub-section of fans who mistakenly think that's it's somehow superior - but whatever).

A brilliant mash-up of samurais and science-fiction with a solid steel grasp of what makes a story pop and explode in all the right way (the first chapter is an absolute masterclass in how to set up a world in a fun, dynamic, no nonsense way: trimming out all the unnecessary expository fat and leaving only the lean, mean action muscle).

Oddly reminiscent (or is this just me?) of The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles comics (who must surely owe this book's mix of the far east and evil cybernetic baddies (set in a sprawling and filthy modern day New York) a debt of gratitude): this has the rollicking action and extreme passion for moody sword -wielding heroes and verbose evil do-ers that burns in the heart of every teenage boy all over the world: but contained and directed in expert and precise blasts in everything from it's panel construction to it's wild use of colour (mainly - it must be said - in green, green and more green). A book that's basically a joy to read from start to finish with a particularly devilish sense of humour ("Give you... ...my hands?").

Like it says: "It's the twenty-first century. Try to have an open mind."

...............................................................................................................................................
Links: Comic Book Resources Article, 4thletter Review, An Existential Nightmare Review, Uncharted Territory Review, Sean T Collins Review, The Comics Journal Article: Run of the Miller.

Further reading: Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Akira, Hard Boiled, The Life and Times of Martha Washington in The Twenty-First Century, 300.

Profiles: Frank Miller.

All comments welcome.

Wednesday, 21 September 2011

Books: Sin City

_________________________________________________________________________________

Sin City
Vol 1: The Hard Goodbye
By Frank Miller

1992




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/

Sin City
Vol 2: A Dame to Kill For
By Frank Miller

1994




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/

Sin City
Vol 3: The Big Fat Kill
By Frank Miller

1995




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/

Sin City
Vol 4: That Yellow Bastard
By Frank Miller

1994




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/

Sin City
Vol 5: Family Values
By Frank Miller

1997




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/

Sin City
Vol 6: Booze, Broads & Bullets
By Frank Miller

1998




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/

Sin City
Vol 7: Hell and Back
By Frank Miller

2000




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/

Apparently Frank Miller always wanted to write crime comics. Of course when he started the only option was superheroes - which is why he gravitated towards Daredevil and Batman - the most "crime-y" super-powered guys out there... But then: after the massive success of The Dark Knight Returns Frank found himself in the enviable position of being able to do whatever the hell he wanted - and it turned out that what he most wanted to do was: Sin City.

Looking back now it's very easy to overlook how jarring and unexpected and strange these books were when they were first released back in the early 1990s. There were other books around that dealt with more than just men in tights - but they were still playing familiar beats and using each frame and panel to advance the story in one way or another. Sin City on the other hand - and especially the first volume - glories and revels in images for their own sake: many of which balloon to fill the page - so while other comics would have a kiss last a small tucked away panel Frank likes to draw the moments out and let's them spill out full-size page after page after page. If you like operatic emotions played as loudly as possible then you will agree that this is a good thing. And then there's the explosive black and white artwork that maximizes the full effect of both. It's hard to tell if he poured the black ink on to white paper - or the other way around (mostly likely a bit of both I guess): but the effect is comparable to having knives poked all the way up to the tip of your eyeballs: it's stark, powerful and at all times utterly and totally melodramatic with all the characters flaunting themselves and their curves and bulges at every available opportunity.

The stories themselves are simple-seeming revenge/hero fantasies inflated to epic proportions that delight in taking unexpected twists and 360 degree turns ("neo-noir" is a good term - or even better: "super-noir"! noir stories souped up to superhuman scales). I say "simple-seeming" because although the plots seem to be lug-headed and brutish - steam-rolling from fight to fight: underneath the bang-bang there are mechanics and various small intricacies that would make a watchmaker jealous: it's not just the stories referencing each other: but the way that it refashions every single dog-eared cliché and worn-out trope to sting in strange new way - yeah - if they're making you feel sweaty and uncomfortable (That Yellow Bastard especially): then it's because that's what Frank wants you to.

Comprising seven volumes in total: that add up together - although they can be read in any order: it's a hefty collection but one that you can be happy swimming in and out of (it's such a bleak landscape that it could be dangerous reading them all one after another). Six of the volumes tell complete end-to-end stories - while Vol 6: Booze, Broads and Bullets (which in three words is pretty much the Modus operandi of the whole series): is a odds-and-ends collection of stories left over from elsewhere. My favourite is the first one (first published as just "Sin City" but then subsequently rebranded as "The Hard Goodbye" when things took off): whose always momentum-building ongoingingly-forward plot makes it feel both like the most stream-lined - and most epic. Although I'd also praise Hell and Back for it's virtuoso drug-filled middle section that is - simply put - freaking amazing.

Yes - it's all full of silhouetted babes with their clothes half-hanging off. Yes - it's full of macho-men being macho and doing tons of macho-kinda-stuff. And yes - it's it's all about as subtle as a swastika-shaped ninja star to the head: but (well): that's the point. It glorifies in the over-the-top scenarios and crazy juxtapositions with everyone pitched to absurdly heroic and grotesque proportions (and sometimes both at the same time) and uses them all to provoke all sorts of interesting reactions. Because - yeah - Frank Miller knows how to draw, and he knows how to write (even if it's just dumb-dumb stuff like: "There's nothing like a ravishingly beautiful nymphomaniac to distract a guy." - there's lots of better quotes I could pulled: but (sorry) that one's my favorite) and he knows how to pull plenty of your strings. The best description/explanation I've ever heard came from a Coen Brothers (see: here): "You have a scene in a movie when someone gets shot, right? ... And the squib goes off and the blood runs down and you get a reaction, right? It's movie fodder, you know what I mean? And in a really different way, a baby's face is movie fodder. You just wanna take elements that are good fodder and do something different with them." That's whats great about Sin City. It does something different. In a very cool way. Whilst purring in pure comics pleasure.

.........................................................................................................................................
Links: Comic Book Resources Review of the Entire Series, Bookslut Article: Sin City: The Adaptation, BLAM! The Literal Architecture of Sin City Article by Luke Arnott, Graphic Content Review of Vol 1 / Vol 2 / Vol 3 / Vol 4 / Vol 5 / Vol 6 / Vol 7.

Further reading: Criminal, Hard Boiled, 100 Bullets, Desolation Jones, Batman: Year One, Goldfish, Button Man, Richard Stark's Parker, Daredevil: Born Again.

Profiles: Frank Miller.

All comments welcome.

Thursday, 1 September 2011

Books: Hard Boiled

_________________________________________________________________________________

Hard Boiled
Written by Frank Miller
Art by Geof Darrow

1993




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


Oof.

Back when Frank Miller was still riding high from the tidal-waves of critical acclaim (and more importantly - huge sales) of The Dark Knight Returns he could pretty much do whatever he wanted. Turns out that what he wanted to do was pilfer all the best bits of Philip K Dick [1] (namely: robots, reality and retromania) and blend with excessive ammounts of ultra-violence, atomic-shaped explosions and scenes of a sexual nature (crikey). The eye-popping results is a lethal cocktail with an after-taste of Blade Runner, Akira and Mad Max - with it's heeving and bustlings futurstic cityscape littered with human bodies, barbed wire and toxic debris. (phew! I'm going to need a cold shower after this...)

If I was going to sum up the book in a single word then I would pump for "excessive." With artwork by Geof Darrow (who also went on to collabate with Miller on The Big Guy and Rusty The Boy Robot - and also (perhaps more famously) Matrix films - where he worked as the conceptual designer) every single panel of this book is rammed full and crowded with thousands of tiny details (chocolate wrappers, fetuses, pointy weaponary etc) - bringing to mind "Where's Wally" for sociopaths (and yeah - that would be my tagline for the book). With slow motion explosions extended to crazy lengths (this must be where Neo got it from). In direct contrast to the pictorial gluttony is the dialogue, plot and characterisation which is all stripped right on down to the bone. This is book that cares not about psychophysical rigor or mental insights (if you want that kind of stuff - go and watch a play): rather it's all about stimulus overload - with an onslaught of ever-more outrageous images with dialogue that nestles above it with an almost absurd counterbalances (a full page explosion and all he can say is "Oof"? That's pretty funny).

........................................................................................................................................................
[1] Some sources (ie things on the internet) say that this was based on a particular Philip K Dick short story - but I'm stuck as to which one they mean - my best guess: The Electric Ant? which - incidently - you really should read if you haven't already.

........................................................................................................................................................
Links: Comics You Should Own Review, Comic Book Bin Review, They Stole Frazier's Brain Review.

Further reading: The Big Guy and Rusty The Boy Robot, Elektra: Assassin, Sin City, The Filth, Domu, The Bulletproof Coffin, Special Forces, Prophet, Judge Dredd: The Cursed Earth Saga, The Life and Times of Martha Washington in The Twenty-First Century, Orc Stain, Philip K Dick's Electric Ant.

Profiles: Frank Miller.

All comments welcome.

Wednesday, 17 August 2011

Books: Batman: Year One

_________________________________________________________________________________

Batman: Year One
Written by Frank Miller
Art by David Mazzucchelli

1988




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


"Year One" is a term used in political history to refer to the start of a radical, revolutionary change. So - when Frank Miller (fresh of the success of Batman: The Dark Knight Returns) got given the chance to re-tell the first faltering steps of Bruce Wayne's crime-fighting career - he thought not only is it a cool-sounding title [1] but it's also a place to make a radical, revolutionary change that (not to get too hyperbolic about things) has since swept the entire world of entertainment: what if you told a realistic Batman story? Yeah. That's right. A superhero comic book that doesn't take place in some faraway fantasy land: but in a world that looks and acts and feels just like our own.

Of course nowadays what with the Christopher Nolan Batman films [2] and things like Kick-Ass and Defendor and Special and Super [3] and stuff like that (hell - it's particularly it's own mini-genre at this point) it no longer seems like such a radical idea: but back in the day it just wasn't the sort of thing that was done. Hell - Tim Burton's Batman film (released the year after this) - thought that the only way to make Batman make sense was to put him into an oh-so-obviously artificial looking Gotham City where all the backgrounds are matte paintings [4] and everything looks like a sound-stage [5].

Although often referred to as an origin story - Year One actually skips the deaths of Thomas and Martha Wayne (already well covered in The Dark Knight Returns [6]) and goes straight to Bruce as a young adult - returning from his travels aboard and sends him straight into the fray - making it all up as he goes along. With a real-world kinda vibe that has him going up against gangsters and crooked cops - as opposed to his typical rogues gallery of costumed loons - and with stark and crispy artwork from David Mazzucchelli (better known now for his sterling work drawing and writing Asterios Polyp) this is a Batman that's less Tim Burton and more Martin Scorsese - (thinking particularly of Taxi Driver). And because it's written by Frank Miller - it's tense, edgy and thrilling in all the right places.

My only gripe is that I wish it were longer - even knowing that Frank Miller continues his Batman run in other Batman books - Year One has such a great feeling and atmosphere, Miller and Mazzucchelli such good chemistry and the story feels like it's only just got going that it's a shame that there's not more (although there is a Batman: Year Two by a different creative team - that although I've never actually read it - doesn't seem like much to get excited about).

...................................................................................................................................................
[1] And one that caught on with lots of other DC characters which is why the world has: Robin: Year One, Black Lightning: Year One, JLA: Year One, Green Arrow: Year One etc (none of which are worth your time).

[2] And he owes Frank Miller a drink. At the very least.

[3] Which in my humble opinion is the best of the bunch.

[4] What? You thought this was real?

[5] And just going back to the Chris Nolan's Batman films just a sec: gotta say even that doesn't quite manage to make things feel that realistic. Pretty much everytime you see Christian Bale in his full get-up he looks more like a chump dressed up as Batman than - you know - actually Batman.

[6] Which you could kinda see as a sequel - altho one with a completely different tone and sense of place.

...................................................................................................................................................
Links: Robot 6: Your Wednesday Sequence | David Mazzucchelli’s Year One, The M0vie Blog Review, IGN Review, Nerd Bastards Review, NPR Interview with Frank Miller.

Further reading: Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Batman: All Star Batman and Robin, Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again, Daredevil: Born Again, Asterios Polyp, Batman: The Long Halloween, Sin City, Batman: Broken City, Batman: Year 100, Gotham Central.

Profiles: Frank Miller.

All comments welcome.

Wednesday, 20 July 2011

Books: Batman: All Star Batman and Robin

_______________________________________________________________________________

Batman: All Star Batman and Robin
Written by Frank Miller
Art by Jim Lee

2008




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/

Ok. First came - in 1986 - The Dark Knight Returns - surpassingly the last Batman story: Bruce Wayne comes out of retirement to do battle with his foes one last time, it's amazing, it changes the industry, wins loads of awards etc. Then in 1987 there was Batman: Year One - the first Batman story: how Bruce Wayne became Batman and how it all got started, very moody, artwork by David Mazzucchelli (now famous for Asterios Polyp) one of the supposed inspiration for Christopher Nolan's Batman films, also very good (if a little short). Then: in 2001 we have the Dark Knight Returns sequel - The Dark Knight Strikes Again - which is the last, last Batman story - and introduces for the first time Dick Grayson (who it's fair to say seems to have some issues with Bruce Wayne): it sales well - but lots of people complain and say it's not enough like The Dark Knight Returns (oh well). Which brings us to this: All Star Batman and Robin. The prequel to Dark Knight Returns/Strikes Back and the sequel to Batman: Year One: and the story of how Dick Grayson got started. You don't have to read all of them other books to get into this (and the tone's vary wildly between them): but they do all refer to each other in lots of nice little ways and they're all well worth getting into. But anyway: what I wanted to say: judging from the shrill voices on the internet lots of people hate this book (even more so than The Dark Knight Strikes Again) and a lot of that can be reduced to one line of dialogue: "I'm the Goddamn Batman." (see: knowyourmeme): although the negative response that greeted that one line apparently just inspired Miller to use it in every subsequent issue (God bless him).

I know it's lazy to just cut and paste from other people's reviews but what the hey: "absurdly bad, faux-noir dialogue," "one of the biggest train wrecks in comics history," "a comic series that just spirals deeper and deeper into the abyss of unreadable. I understand Miller's need to re-invent, but this is just badly done and in poor taste... Frank Miller has stripped Batman of all of his dignity, class, and honour. This isn't the Dark Knight; this is Dirty Harry in a cowl. The worst part is that this is exactly what Batman isn't about.. "In one fell swoop, Miller has erased all the good he did for Batman with The Dark Knight Returns and Batman: Year One. All of that is just gone." Maybe these people have a point and it sure sounds like they had an awful time reading this book: but I loved it. I thought that Batman was supposed to be Dirty Harry in cowl. I thought part of the fun was watching him doing insane things and laughing his head off. And I thought that everyone already knew that he's ruthless, mean with a malicious fascist-streak running through the inside. (no? oh well). Like Batman: Year One the artwork isn't Frank Miller but instead is handled by superstar artist Jim Lee (one of the founders of Image Comics) and proponent of an art-style that was everywhere in 1990s and I like to think of as "American Manga": it's very in-your-face, arty and stylized and makes an ideal match to Miller's hard boiled and excessive writing style. Also - you should know that this was originally intended to be two volumes long - but - apparently because Jim Lee had problems sticking to the deadline - so it was put on "hiatus" - and well hopefully be concluded under the new name "Dark Knight: Boy Wonder."

..............................................................................................................................................
Links: 4th Letter Posts on how "Frank Miller Owns Batman", Comics Alliance Article: The Grand Unified Theory of Frank Miller's Batman: Will, Hope and Tenderness, Jog The Blog Review, Atop The Fourth Wall Review of #1 and #2, Comic Book Resources Review, Sean T Collins Review.

Further reading: Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again, Batman: Year One, Superman: All Star Superman.

Profiles: Frank Miller.

All comments welcome.

Wednesday, 15 June 2011

Books: Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again

________________________________________________________________________________

Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again
By Frank Miller

2004





Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


Why are people always using "comic book" as a pejorative?

Mostly I notice it when people are talking about superhero movies they like: "Yeah - it was good. You know: It wasn't too comic-booky." As if "comic book" was synonymous with "simple-minded" or "stupid" or "something just for children."

I mean - yeah - ok - I understand that there are reasons. Culturally and all that - comic books have usually just been things to keep the kids quite or (even worse) something for nerdy fanboys to drool over and vent all their unhealthy little fantasties. But if I was going to insist on better language use and all (and yeah damn right I'm gonna insist) then I guess I'd say something about how - one - it doesn't really make that much sense to define something with such a board brush (think how much sense it would be if someone said: "yeah - that was a bit too filmy." or "It was a bit novelly." - no?) and - two - even if we just go with the flow and accept that "comic book" is tied to this kinda juvenile definition well hell: what the hell is wrong with things being bright and wild and fun?

Good example of this: my and my girlfriend watched Batman Returns the other day. Now so you know - my girlfriend isn't really big on comic books or any of that kind of stuff and had only ever seen the Christopher Nolan Batman films - and so her expectations were for something gritty and realistic and well much less-comic-booky - so that in the first 5 minutes [1] she was like "What the hell is this?" and then - when the posh parents dumped their monster baby over the bridge and into the river she turned to me accusingly and said: "Oh my god - is this a Tim Burton movie?"

"Striking terror. Best part of the job."

Who knows why fifteen years after the universally praised, game-changed graphic novel masterpiece stupendousness of The Dark Knight Returns Frank Miller thought it would be a good idea to write the sequel that no one was asking for. But hey Frank knows best and - thankfully - rather than try to rehash the first book he decided to opt for something completely fresh, different and insanely inspired: The Dark Knight Strikes Again aka (if you really want to) "DK2." Reportedly inspired by the prevalance of all the dark, grim, gritty and nasty comics that sprung up in the wake of DK1 (sorry) and Watchmen - that all seemed to think that the only thing that made those books so successful was that that it mixed up superheroes with mental health issues, psychopaths and rapists - DK2 is an attempt to re-connect superheroes to their fun, crazy, wild starting point: when it was all about heroes in bright coloured costumes effortlessly doing all sorts of silly and impossible things. Or to put it another way: when even comic books are afraid of being too "comic booky" - well: you know that something's up.

So: while it loosely continues the previous book's storyline: this is it's own thing, done it's own way. Or to put it another way: if The DK1 was a orchestral symphony: carefully structured, multi-layered, restrained and delicated poised (or at least as much as a comic about Batman could ever be) - then DK2 - is raucous, dischordant, snot-nosed, day glo punk played hard, fast and loud. With artwork that feels like it was thrown at the page (abstract expressionist superheroes? yes please) and computer-generated colouring that - for once - is used for cool effects rather than as a lazy shortcut and a story that sizzles, flies and explodes like a fireworks factory on fire dropped from the sky. (Or put another another way: it's like Radiohead decided to follow up Ok Computer with something totally different. You know: like Kid A [3]). Revolutionary - but maybe not in the way that you wanted (and yeah: I should say it was panned and booed when it first came out [4]) - but if you want something that's not more of the same and adjust your expecatations from what you thought The Dark Knight Returns Again was supposed to be - this is a comic ready to show you a good time. It's like Batman Returns - but added double-rainbow [5].

Exuberantly bonkers.

...........................................................................................................................................
[1] And man if you haven't watched Batman Returns before you can see the opening here - which I'm hoping should be enough to whet your appetite enough to go and see the whole thing. Think it could be my favourite of all the Batman films: it's got such great lines: "Still... could be worse. My nose could be gushing blood." "Why is their always someone who brings eggs and tomatoes to a speech?" and (my personal favourite and best line in a Batfilm ever): "Selina!? Selina Kyle, you're fired! And Bruce Wayne - why are you dressed up like Batman?" Plus - I never really realised when I watched it when I was young (back then I just thought that the casting people must have made a mistake) but Michael Keaton is such a great choice as Batman. Yeah - he's not muscle-bound and he doesn't have the square jaw that I thought was pretty much a must have prerequisite for all Bruce Wayne wannabes: but he's so off kilter and bizarre - like a mixture of Tom Hanks and Jerry Seinfeld that it makes total sense that he want to spend his nights dressing up in a leather suit and go around beating up bad-guys [2]. And - god - after watching the po-faced Nolan Batfilms - it's just really refreshing to watch something that doesn't take itself too seriously - I especially love the bit when Keaton's getting his Batsuit off the coat-hanger. I mean - I know that there was a big fuss when Tim Burton's first Batman film came out that it wasn't anything like the old campy Adam West Batman - but in retrospect they both have the same sense of twisted fun: and the sense that although it's real people - they all live in a cartoon world. Plus (you know): how can you not love something that has Christopher Walken in?

[2] In fact (if I may?) check out this Rolling Stone interview Tim Burton gave when his first Batman film came out: Question: "What's Batman about to you? Bruce Wayne's depression?" Tim Burton: "It's about depression, and it's about lack of integration. It's about a character . . . unfortunately I always see it being about those things, not about some kind of hero who is saving the city from blah-blah-blah. If you asked me the plot of Batman, I couldn't tell you. It's about duality, it's about flip sides, it's about a person who's completely fucked and doesn't know what he's doing. He's got good impulses, but he's not integrated. And it's about depression. It's about going through life, thinking you're doing something, trying very hard. And the Joker represented somebody who got to act however he wants.

[3] Ha: Yeah: try disliking it now without coming across as a philistine.

[4] "OH MY GOD!!! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!? Honest-to-God, this has got to be the worst comic book that I’ve ever read in my entire life. It’s as if you accidentally left a copy of “The Dark Knight Returns” in the washing machine with a handful of crayons, then thought to yourself “f**k it” and repackaged it as a sequel. If I didn’t already know you were the author and artist of this atrocious sequel, I would be angry at this apparent insult to your good name. To realize that the genius behind “The Dark Knight Returns” and “Year One” is also the moron responsible for this clustered mess just makes me sad... DK2 was released between 2001 and 2002, shortly after the tragedy of 9/11, and therefore it had potential to touch on the feelings of anger and the desires for retribution that were on the hearts and minds of its readers. It had potential for historic relevance and to touch on the issues that were on the collective consciousness of its readers, much like its predecessor title did. It was during this time of anguish that we needed our heroes more than ever, something to give us hope and inspiration even in those worst of times.Unfortunately, it is here where DK2 fails utterly. Our beloved heroes are just another series of casualties, assassinated by mischaracterization. They are neither inspirational nor admirable. At some point, this stopped being a graphic novel and degenerated into a bizarre and inappropriate snuff fanfic. While DKR definitely succeeded as a product of its time, DKSA served to illustrate not only how out of touch you were with the times and the readers, but how out of touch you are with reality in general.Maybe that’s the problem. Maybe you’re angry because you’re out of touch with the new generation of comic book readers. It would certainly explain why reading this book feels like an old man with a shotgun is yelling at me to get off his lawn." (from this guy here).

[5] So intense!

...........................................................................................................................................
Links: Frank MIller AV Club Interview, 4th Letter Review Part 1 / Part 2 / 4th Letter Transcript of Comics Journal Interview with Frank Miller, Comic Book Resources Frank Miller Interview, Good Comics Review, GraphiContent Article: Put on Your Tights and Give Them Hell Part 1 / Part 2 / Part 3 / Part 4 / Part 5 / Part 6 / Part 7, Thoughts On Stuff Review, Flak Magazine Review, Sean T Collins Review.

Further reading: Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Batman: All Star Batman and Robin, Elektra: Assassin, Tom Strong, The Big Guy and Rusty The Boy Robot, Batman: Year One, Batman: Year 100, Kingdom Come, Marvel Boy, Special Forces.

Profiles: Frank Miller.

All comments welcome.