Tuesday, 17 July 2012

Books: Judge Dredd: The Complete Case Files 07

________________________________________________________________________________

Judge Dredd: The Complete Case Files 07
Writers: John Wagner, Alan Grant
Artists: Jim Baikie, Steve Dillon, Brett Ewins, Carlos Ezquerra, Ian Gibson, Cam Kennedy, Kim Raymond, Ron Smith
2007



Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


Back when I was young one of my favourite books was The A to Z to Judge Dredd ("from Aaron Aardvark to Zachary Zziiz!") - apparently released to coincide with what is now the first Judge Dredd film - it was a cornucopia [1] of Mega City One facts and titbits that told you everything you ever needed to know - from the names of famous Judges (from the top of my head: Judge Giant, Judge Anderson, Judge Hershey, Judge McGruder (that's the one with the beard), oh  - and Judge Caligula (ha - he was great)), to the locations (Grand Hall of Justice, Resyk, Brit-Cit!), to the trends and crazes (Boinging! And Uncle Ump's Umpty Candy "The sweet that was too good to eat!") and the random characters (Chopper - of course, James Fenemore Snork, Tweak!, Mrs Gunderson, PJ Maybe). What I loved most about it was how all the entries connected up with each other (looking back now I realise that in some respects it was the spiritual forebearer to this blog) and how - even tho it was all fictional - it seemed like it could be real because the level of detail was dizzying: it was a fully worked out Universe that contained a multitude of stories [2] [3]. 

I mean yeah - I also used to buy 2000AD and The Judge Dredd Megazine (plus I managed to scrounge a few back issues (sorry - "progs") here and there): plus I had a few collected editions too (published by Titan - they were called Judge Dredd 1, Judge Dredd 2, Judge Dredd 3 etc - but they weren't actually sequential in the stuff they contained - in fact they were more a wild hodge podge than anything else - like someone had just selected their favourite stories and jammed them all together willy nilly) - so I knew my Dredds and could tell you what all the six settings on Dredd's lawgiver was [4] - but I think it was more the world that I loved than the actual stories themselves - so much so - that it was more that I read the stories just so that I could get a sense of the world that it could only capture in small ammounts - like a cup of water can only ever give you a small part of the sea (ooooh - poetic!). 

So - credentials shown - apart from putting up a thing about the Batman/Judge Dredd Files book - why have I only got around to writing about Old Stoney face now? Well - what with my pernickety nature - I think in the past what I really wanted to do was put up a mega post that collected ALL the Judge Dredd: Complete Cases Files books so that it was all neated stacked up in the same place (and oh man - when I was a kid I used to wish that someone who make a Complete Case Files back (or whatever you want to call it) but assumed that the powers-that-be had somesort of vested interest in making sure that - I dunno - making sure that I couldn't read every Judge Dredd story ever - damn them). But (oh the irony) Islington currently doesn't have the complete set of the Complete Case Files (so far just 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and - strangely - 17 [5]) and - well - I didn't want to embrass anyone by writing about something that had so many missing parts. So - yes - what with the movie coming up - I thought I that I would treat each collection separately and just write about them one individually and - hell - seeing as I was going wild - not even bother to review them in order (I know! I was as shocked as you). 

When I was writing the Batman/Judge Dredd Files post - I said something about how Dredd stories where best when he wasn't the main attraction - but rather was used as a way to explore or understand or - hell - just laugh at - the incorrigible exploits of the various denizens [6] of Mega City One [7]. Which lead me to thinking about the difference between American and British hero pin-ups. In America - with all it's Batmans and Supermans and Spidermans (and that's just the comic books - I could talk films and books and find another 100 examples easy)  - character is key. And if you're telling a story about a hero most of the time you're dealing with their struggles and trails and - eventually (somewhere at the end of the story) - their victories and triumphs and you're telling it all from the perspective inside their heads (like - think any Frank Miller story ever - especially The Dark Knight Returns) because - you know - America is all about it's individuals and all about one person going up against the system and blah blah blah. In England on the other hand - a lot of the time we prefer our heroes to have their interior lives closed off and generally be a little bit unknowable - and in the stories they appear in - the point of it isn't so much whether or not they can summon up somesort of Nietzschen Will to Power (or whatever): but rather how many crazy ideas and bonkers concepts the author can throw into the mix - I thinking of particularly: Dr Who, Sherlock Holmes and - yeah - Judge Dredd [8] [9]. 

But let's stop all this preamble and get to The Complete Case Files 07. What was it like? How good it is? It it worth reading? And all that stuff.

Judge Dredd was one of the first comics that I think I ever read and - as sad as this is to say - looking at the names of the artists within was kinda like looking over the names of old friends (or - if they're artists that I didn't like that much - like looking over the names of people that I went to school with) and so there was a nice nostaglic glow that rushed in as soon as I started reading through these - coupled with the fact - that there were a few stories scattered throughout that I haven't read before (so to continue the school metaphor - it was liking revisiting your old playgrounds and then discovering parts of it that you had never come across before - which I'll tell you: is a nice feeling to have). 

There's no big epics in this collection - no wars or giant battles with extra-dimensional villains - it's all relatively small-scale stuff - a-day-in-the-life type things rather than once-in-a-lifetime stuff which made it a lot easier to acclimatize myself back into how the Big Meg works. So there's a story with werewolves (which - yeah - was a little bit meh) even if it did feature some pretty tasty Steve Dillon artwork (that's the guy who did Preacher): with a whole bunch of strong black and whites and a nice hefty sense of objects (especially the way he draws the Lawmaster), there's a tale called Bob & Carol & Ted & Ringo that's just like Free Willy - if the little boy was a robot and the whale was four dinosaurs [11]. And in fact the thing that comes through the clearest is how elastic the Judge Dredd concept is - you can do horror (The Haunting of Sector House 9), social commentary (The Wreckers) and even sports drama (Requiem for a Heavyweight - which is pretty conventional in the story it tells with lots of familar beats and cliches - yet manages to be wildly entertaining through the fact that instead of telling a story about boxers - it's about fatties (and that's not me being mean - that's the Judge Dredd technical term for them) - plus you know bonus points from the fact that it's done by Carlos Ezquerra who is basically THE Dredd artist (he was the co-creator along with John Wagner)). The only real limits are the fact that each part is only five or six pages long and there's always a gotta be some fights or random destructions (because - hey - the target audience is and always will be teenage boys). But beyond all that there's nice little turns of phrase: "Stow the silver bullets - Bike Cannon!" "Hailstones as big as your stupid heads!" and lots of big ideas (and in Rumble in the Jungle: big machinery) and - the idea that I keep - circling around - the sense of Mega City One as being a real place.

Which brings us to the reason that I choose this particular volume as the first book I wanted to talk about: The Graveyard Shift.
 
Now - I realise that everyone has their favourite Judge Dredd stories and let's face it - there's a lot to choose from (with everything from The Cursed Earth to Necropolis, from America to the Apocalypse War, from The Pit to The Judge Child) but me - the best distillation of everything that is great about Judge Dredd is in the 7 episode mini-epic of The Graveyard Shift. Not only is it the best introduction to the world of Judge Dredd I can think of but it's also the most no-nonsense: it's just Judge Dredd on patrol on one the worst nights of the year - there's no big villain, no big event, no special mission - just a man doing his job and calmy accepting a whole mess of strange and fantastical - erm - stuff. And - obviously - because it's Dredd: imposing the law. From the opening lines ("Night falls on Mega-City One, towering future city in the 22nd Century. On watching bays high above the neon streets, keen-eyed Judges take up position. There will be trouble tonight, there is always trouble on The Graveyard Shift!") to the taut dialogue ("Dredd here. Responding."), the barrage of facts and statistics (""There are now 24 A.R.V.s, 139 Serious Assaults, 5 Murders, 0.09 Classifiable Riots and 230 Traffic Offences every minute.") to the constast use of crazy future lingo ("A.R.V., Meat Wagons, Cubes, 299, Juve Rumbles, Vid-ins, H-Wagons, Rad-Winds, Catch-Wagons, Boingers, Stumm Gas, Conapts, S&S, 59Cs, Citi-Defs, Pat-Wagons, Pedways") it all just feels so realistic and immersive and serious (even in the face of the absurd) [12]. Plus it also has one of the best Judge Dredd action-movie style dialogues (which is up there - for me - with the much more famous: "Gaze into the fist of Dredd!" [13]: Dredd outside on his bike on his radio: "Dredd to Control! Got a robbery in progress, Jeta Sports on Winston. No Assistance Required." Radio chirps back: "Message logged. Catch Wagon on it's way." Interior shot: Dredd's outline visible through the glass: "You creeps! You got 10 second to come out with your hands empty!" The creeps inside turn and look: "Holy Moley! It's Dredd!" They fire back: "BDAMM! PTOWW! BLAM!" Dredd get's on his radio again: "Control - better make that a meat wagon." "What's the body count Dredd?" Close up of Dredd's mouth: "I'll let you know." (cue: ACTION MUSIC). All this praise in despite of the fact that the art is Ron Smith who've never been a particular favourite of mine (I wish I knew how to describe his style - but there's something about his juttering lines and the way his shapes bend (or something) that just leaves me completely cold - and yet for some reason - he always ends up drawing some of the best Dredd stories - including Citizen Snork and Portrait of a Politician - both included here). I mean - it's not the best thing ever - and I don't want to build it up too much - and I think the fact that I first read it when I was just a kid has a lot to do with how much I revere it - but damn it - if I was going to make a Judge Dredd movie - it's the story I would use as a template (Hello? Hollywood? Can you hear me? Why aren't you returning my phone calls?).  

.................................................................................................................................................
[1] My - that's a nice word. "Cornucopia." Mmmmmmm

[2] And if that idea sounds appealing then may I recommend a short story called: Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius by Jorge Luis Borges (which is in three different collections: The Garden of Forking Paths, Fictions and Labyrinths). And if you want any more incentive - let me say that Borges is like the M.C. Escher of short stories and reading him will make your life more full in ways you can't quite understand yet. So yeah.

[3] Also: I thought that by now someone who would have had updated The A to Z and made a comprensive Judge Dredd wiki - but all there is this which (at the time of writing) only has 41 measy pages. Rubbish.

[4] Really? You wanna know? Well ok then: Standard Execution, Heat Seeker, Ricochet, Incendiary, Armour Piercing and High-Explosive (in Jean-Baptiste Emmanuel Zorg voice: "My favourite").

[5] If you really really really want to help us get the missing books from the series (or if there are any other books you want to read that Islington doesn't currently have in stock) then you should know that you can try and order some copies on this handy little online reservation form.

[6] "Denizens" - another tasty little word.

[7] And if you want a small glimpse of the scale of world-building this series has achieved then have a look at this wikipedia entry for Mega City One (placed  #1 on The Architects Journal list of "comic book cities."!)

[8] And let's just take a minute to reflect uponhow damn peculiar it is that one of England's most famous comic book heroes is an American Policeman. I mean - yeah - a futuristic American Policeman - but still. This from a country that has always had a little bit of a faught relationship with it's authority figures (best recent example: these amazon reviews on the Olympic Mascots Wenlock Policeman Figurine) and seeing how most heroes in our country (Robin Hood) and others (well - all the Batmans and Supermans and Spidermans) tend to operate outside the law - I guess it's just a tesatament to England's perverse sense of the absurd or something (woo - go us).

[9] And just to continue the thought a little further and give one last example: when my girlfriend first saw the cover of this book (and it's oh-so-fetching-shade of pink) she made a comment about how I was always reading books about robots. Of course - being a mean awful boy - I then proceeded to mock her mercilessly for thinking that Judge Dredd was a robot (because - obviously - me knowing so much more about Judge Dredd puts me at a higher social standing than her obviously). And yeah - comparing Judge Dredd - England's version of American's future lawman (and - duh - not a robot) with Robocop - America's version of America's [10] future lawman (who - well - if you want to get technical about it - name aside - also isn't exactly a robot (definition: "A machine resembling a human being and able to replicate certain human movements and functions") but is more strictly speaking a cyborg (definition: "A person whose physical abilities become superhuman by mechanical elements built into the body." and - oh god - I've wasted my life learning the differences between the two and then writing about it in a review of a bloody Judge Dredd comic on the frigging internet - but whatever - let's carry on) - but then I guess Cybocop doesn't have the same ring to it). Point being - in terms of an emotional investment - in the type of stories they tell you're going to end up caring a lot more about Alex Murphy (if we're just talking about the first film - because let's face it - the sequels sucked) then you ever would about Joe Dredd (who's been going for over 30 frigging years).

[10] And - yes - I realise that Paul Verhoeven (the guy who directed Robocop - and also Total Recall and Starship Troopers - so you know - respect is due) is Dutch - but there is a reason that you get 1,220,000 results when you google "American Jesus Robocop" so shut up ok?

[11] Oh - and speaking of Free Willy - if you fancy getting bummed out about something then please read this.

[12] And if you like that kind of crazy-obsessive science-fiction world building then you really should check out Alan Moore's Halo Jones (link below).

[13] See here if you have no idea what I'm talking about.

.................................................................................................................................................
Links: Dredd Reckoning Review, 2000AD Review Interview with Alan Grant, Rob Williams and Al Ewing.

Further reading: Judge Dredd: The Cursed Earth SagaJudge Dredd: The Complete Case Files 05Judge Dredd: The Complete Case Files 06Judge Anderson: Satan, The Batman/Judge Dredd Files, The Complete Future Shocks, D.R. and Quinch, Skizz, The Ballad of Halo Jones.

All comments welcome.

Books: Neil Gaiman's Midnight Days

_______________________________________________________________________________

Neil Gaiman's Midnight Days
Written by Neil Gaiman
Art by Stephen R. Bissette and John Totleben, Richard Piers Rayner, Mike Hoffman, Matt Wagner, Mike Mignola and Dave McKean
1999



Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


An odds and ends scrapbook of previously uncollected Neil Gaiman stories that don't really fit anywhere else - I wouldn't really suggest Midnight Days for someone who's only just starting out and what's to see all the fuss is about - it's more for people who have already read The Sandman and are looking for something extra to quell their Neil Gaiman comic cravings: (so more like a plate of apéritifs than a full hearty meal).

Well - I say The Sandman (still the comic series for which Mr Gaiman is most renowned) - but actually - apart from the final story (which pits The Sandman of The Endless (or Dream as most of us know him [1]) with The Golden Age Sandman (a character first created all the way back in 1939)) the figure that hangs over this book the most is The Swamp Thing and - by extension - seeing how he's the guy responsible for making the idea of a giant green swamp monster seem respectable and a suitable contender for high-comics-art (or whatever you want to call it) - Alan Moore [2]. There's three Swamp Thing stories in all here: The first - Jack in the Green - is a leftover script back when Gaiman was still trying to break into comics - that's been made into an actual comic for the purposes of this collection and illustrated by the two guys who did the art for Alan Moore's now legendary run: Stephen R. Bissette and John Totleben. It's pretty slight all-in-all and only a few pages long and probably wouldn't mean much for anyone who hasn't read Alan Moore's Swamp Thing (in fact my one piece of advice for anyone wanted to read Midnight Days is that you should really read Alan Moore's Swamp Thing beforehand - otherwises it's a bit like watching deleted scenes without having first seen the film) but it doesn't suck even if it's a little bit heavy on the allegory side of things (but then he was pretty young when he wrote it - so that's kinda understandable). The second Swamp Thing story is called Brothers - and revolves around some of the non-Swamp Thingy characters from the series as well as a character called Brother Power the Geek [3]: it's all a bit strange and freaky but eventutally things start to come together when you realise - ah! but of course! - the whole thing is a mediation on the end of the free love generation (obviously). And the last one - Shaggy God Stories: despite being illustarted by Hellboy's Mike Mignola (and man: the prospect of a Neil Gaiman/Mike Mignola story sounds amazing) just feels a little bit empty and slight (even if it does has a few ideas that you can tell were the seeds for Gaiman's American Gods novel [4]).

There's also the previously mentioned Sandman Midnight Theatre (which is co-plotted with Matt Wagner) and features very claustrophobic fully painted art from Teddy Kristiansen which - to be honest - my eyes found a little hard to digest. Like I said it does feature Dream from The Sandman - but if that's the only thrill you're looking for when you're reading - you're going to be left disappointed - as he only appears for a few very brief pages. In fact the best thing about the story (like Neil Gaiman mentions in his little introduction) is the party dialogue - the way that you only hear little snippets of conversations that each sound interesting enough to sustain their own stories is pretty cool [5].

But the best thing here (and the one you should probably save til last) is Hold Me. With artwork from Neil Gaiman's long-term partner in crime Dave McKean [6]. A John Constantine story (originally published in Hellblazer #27): Hold Me is a little one-shot about - well - loneliness and the plight of the homeless (a subject obviously close to Neil Gaiman's heart - as it's something he returned to with Neverwhere): although describing it in such plain terms makes it seem trite and two-dimensional when it's anything but. In fact - for me - the best thing about reading it is seeing how all the bits connect up - not in a "story" way but more in the fact that everything is thematically consistent - from the random cab driver conversation to the motives of the woman John meets at the party - all spinning around the idea of the need each of us to make contact with the people around us and the way that need get's perverted along the way. Which - obviously - is pretty smart for a Hellblazer comic. So well done Mr Gaiman. Well done. 

.......................................................................................................................................................
[1] Or seeing how he takes many form - cats and Lord L'Zoril and other things like that - maybe I should say "it"? In fact I'm almost tempted to say "hir" - but then I guess Desire is the only one of the Endless who's transgendered/gender-neutral - so in conclusion: I dunno.

[2] I was going to say actually that I wouldn't have been at all surprised if the reason this book came out is because of the success of the collection of Alan Moore's DC comics stories (which depending which version you have is either called Across the Universe: The DC Universe Stories of Alan Moore or DC Universe: The Stories of Alan Moore) and that Neil Gaiman saw how popular they were I thought - "I'm having some of that" - and asked DC to do the same for his stories - which would you know - fit into the over-arching narrative of Neil Gaiman following in Alan Moore's footsteps (like it says in this book - Neil Gaiman first got his big break through the fact that he was friends with Alan Moore). Except - well - looking at the publication dates - it turns out that this book came out before the Alan Moore ones: so nevermind I guess.

[3] According to wikipedia (man - feels like I should be paying them royalities at this point): he's a character originally created back in the late 1960s who was supposed to be called Brother Power The Freak (which - hell - makes a lot more sense) before DC Management by the possible "drug references" and decided to change it to Geek: "Brother Power was originally a mannequin abandoned in an empty tailor's shop. The shop was taken over by hippies Nick Cranston and Paul Cymbalist, who dressed up the dummy in Paul's wet and bloodied "hip threads" to keep them from shrinking, having been attacked by Hound Dawg and other war hawks. Forgotten for months, but eventually struck by lightning, Brother Power was brought to life and endowed with super power and speed."

[4] Have you read it? It's quite good.

[5] And that whole having "tiny bits of interesting ideas" is something that Neil Gaiman always does really well. There's that Sandman story with the guy who keeps his muse locked up who gets given an excess of story ideas (I think it goes something like this: "So, you like ideas, eh? ... Well, have all the ideas in the world!") and of all the concepts that you hear - each sounds amazing (and isn't the cliché that writers don't like to splurge their ideas in case they run out or something? I dunno). 

[6] Who also did the artwork for the Dark Tower book I just finished reading: Wizard and Glass. Not to mention (with Neil Gaiman): all The Sandman covers and Violent Cases, The Tragical Comedy or Comical Tragedy of Mr Punch and Signal to Noise. 

.......................................................................................................................................................
Links: Comics You Should Own: Hellblazer #27Green Man Review, Eyrie Review.

Further reading: Swamp Thing, The Sandman, DC Universe: The Stories of Alan Moore, Cages, Violent CasesThe Tragical Comedy or Comical Tragedy of Mr Punch, Hellblazer: Pandemonium, Neil Gaiman's Neverwhere, Murder Mysteries.

Profiles: Neil Gaiman.

All comments welcome.

Monday, 16 July 2012

Books: Make Me A Woman

________________________________________________________________________________

Make Me A Woman
By Vanessa Davis
2010





Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


I mean - no duh - (I know this ain't exactly a new insight) but taste is a funny thing isn't it? 

There was this thing that I read about a few years ago called "The Napoleon Dynamite Problem." What it was was that Netflix wanted to improve their recommendation programme ("You liked ___ ? In that case maybe you will also like ____ !") and offered a prize of $1 million to the first people who could improve their algorithm by 10%. Most of the time it seemed it was pretty easy to work out what people liked - I mean - if you liked Aliens then you'd probably like Predator and that kinda stuff (because - well - no duh) but the problem was with films like Napoleon Dynamite. The thing with Napoleon Dynamite is that it was next to impossible to predict who was going to love it and who was going to hate it - so - to use myself as an example: the reason I decided to watch it was because everyone I knew said that it was the kind of film that I would adore and - god - Simon Pegg (who - in case you can't tell is kinda one of my personal heroes if nothing else than Tim Bisley) gave a quote somewhere and said it was his new favourite film or something - and wait a second - I think I may have actually brought it on DVD without having watched it beforehand because hey - everyone says it's great yeah? - and well - let's just say that was the last time I did that.

But watching Napoleon Dynamite gave me the same feeling as reading this book - just what the hell are people enjoying so much? What the hell am I missing?

I'd never heard of this book before I saw it sitting in one of our library crates (blah reservations other branches etc) but - oooh - a new comic in expensive looking hardback! And a front cover that looked like it could be an extract from a Beryl Cook painting [2] so - as usual I was game before I'd even started reading it. And (ok - that old adage about never judge a book by it's cover probably includes it's back cover too - but whatever) on the back it had three glowing little recommendations: “If you don’t like [Vanessa Davis], you don’t like anything good.” —Vice “What distinguishes Davis’s take is a reflective hunger formeaning and connection in the very mundane.” —Bust “Vanessa Davis’s autobiographical slice-of-life drawings are both totally relatable and sweetly surreal.” —Bitch. Now - I've never heard of Bust and Bitch (and I'm a little wary of googling them on a work computer) but I guess I should have heard alarm bells instead of going "ooh - this should be good" when I saw that the top quote was from Vice magazine [3]. Because Vice magazine sucks balls and well - so does this comic.

There's a Doug Stanhope line that goes: "Babies are like poems. They're beautiful to their creator, but to other people, they're silly and they're irritating." And I reckon that goes double for the stuff that people write in their diaries and double-triple for stuff in their diaries that they then decide to illustrate and then put into a comic book for me to read. I know I've said this before about other comic biographies that I've wrote about on here but - damn it - I say it again (and I'll say it in caps) : WHY SHOULD I CARE ABOUT YOUR LIFE? For me - a grumpy late twenty-something but whatever - I need a reason to make my way through a bunch of drawing that look like they were drawn by - well - Napoleon Dynamite (or - wait - even better - Eagle vs Shark! [4]): and (come on) at least give me some small semblance of a story instead of just a random selection of two of three page vignettes - all of which seem to swirl around Jewishness rather than Womanhood (maybe the title should have been: Make Me a Jew? [5]) 

There's that HBO sit-com Girls that seems to be a bit love/hate in the responses it gets (no one on the internet it seems can just say it's ok). Me - I really like it and think it's almost genius. But this book - it's like - all the negative things people say about Girls - that it's self-obessed and boring and of no possible interest to anyone apart from the people that made it - etc - all those things are how I feel about this book.

But - hey - it's all a matter of taste. So - whatever.  

............................................................................................................................................
[1] You can read about it at this New York Times article "If You Liked This, You’re Sure to Love That" here.

[2] Beryl Cook: you know - the artist who draws the people with the sausage arms hanging out in pubs. I wouldn't classify myself as an actual fan - but she's kinda cool and the idea of a whole comic illustrated in that fashion seemed like it could be interesting... (altho it turns out that Vanessa Davis' art doesn't really look like Beryl Cook at all - oh well).

[3] If you haven't heard of Vice it's basically the magazine of choice for American Apparel wearing trendy hipster Shoreditch scum. And - trying to find out the review where that quote came from I found this review: "Vanessa Davis's drawings have a softness to them that feels like sympathetic memories. Maybe I'm off here, but it feels like she views the world in a forgiving way, whether she's showing us the time when everyone was having bat mitzvahs or some Israeli dude was treating her poorly. Everyone is a lovable goofball. There's a particularly good comic in here about going to the sex store with Karen of Meh fame [1. Who? 2. Oh my god - is there really a band out there called "Meh"? (I'm trying to google it but I'm getting nothing. 3. "Going to the sex store with Karen of Meh fame" sounds like a sentence from Sugar Ape - but then I guess every page in Vice sounds like a sentence from Sugar Ape] and being observed by a Hassidic man. It's odd when you run into Hassidic men in places like that. I remember seeing a few at that goth/fetish party they used to have at Siberia [well weapon]. I also remember seeing a couple at a Death in June show on a Sunday morning at the Pyramid Club a few years back. Maybe they were just Orthodox.   Anywayahs, as you may have cottoned, there's a whole load of stories in this book relating to Jewishness.  I especially like one strip where she describes how great Purim is to her boyfriend while he turns up his nose at the concept of "gross Jewish food."  Later he is giggling while reading  a biography of Hitler before bed." I mean ok: I know I'm not one to talk seeing how pretty much this entire blog is just me going on off-tangent digressions (for example: see [3]) - but really - what the hell? What the hell?

[4] A Napoleon Dynamite rip-off that looks better than Napoleon Dynamite. I haven't actually seen it - but I have watched the trailer quite a few times. And it's got Jemaine from Flight of the Conchords! So bonus points for that plus: the title always makes me think of this Thee More Shallows song (double bonus!).

[5] This should go without saying - but I'm not trying to be anti-semitic (like duh). But when oh so very many films, books, comics etc of the past 100 years have touched upon the Jewish experience in one form or another (I won't even bother to write a list of the awesome stuff that's out there because if I did it would probably take all day) - then you really need to bring something new to the table because otherwises - what's the point? And why should I bother to waste my time reading your book?

............................................................................................................................................
Links: Smith Mag Interview, Book Slut Review.

Further reading: American Splendor: The Best of American Splendor, It's a Good Life If You Don't Weaken, Clumsy, I Never Liked You, Marzi, French Milk, Hilda and the Midnight Giant, Breakdowns.

All comments welcome.

Friday, 13 July 2012

Books: Xombi

_________________________________________________________________________________

Xombi
Written by John Rozum
Art by Frazer Irving
2012




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


On the cover there's this quote from Ain't It Cool News: "I haven't read a book this intriguingly and engagingly weird since I first dropped into Grant Morrison's The Invisibles." That's a very enticing little sentence (and I wouldn't be at all surprised if whoever wrote it did so with the hope of getting it splashed on the cover like that - but whatever): because - even tho I'm not The Invisibles biggest fan (altho there are bits of it that I do like a lot): the 2012 version of the Invisibles [1] is a pretty exciting prospect. So - yeah - going into this I was all: woo! Yay! Bring it on. 

And the first issue hits the spot in just the right way. Outlandish concepts and fanciful ideas mixed the promise of some old-school action adventure delivered with just the barest hit of smile? A character called Nun of the Above? Another character called Nun the Less? And a re-running of that thing where you skip to various parts of the world with panel to see strange things happening (eg: "In Moscow a baby was born with six heads. In a library in Northern Queensland all the Fiction started eating the Non-Fiction - while in New York an old lady did a poo that spoke to her in perfect French."[2]: see also: Judge Anderson: Satan and John Smith's Devlin Waugh: Red Tide and I'm pretty sure Grant Morrison has done stuff like it too - but I can't remember exactly where... someplace in The Invisibles maybe?). 

But yeah - wait: some history: Xombi first appeared way back in 1994 and was written then (as now) by John Rozum (different artist tho). So technically this is Xombi 2: same character with the same back-story doing pretty much the same things I guess (according to wikipedia there was also something to do with the big Infinite Crisis thing in 2005/2006 where David Kim (that's the guy who's Xombi) was the Green Lantern or something which I didn't know when I read this - but which I now realise is why there's a little throw-away Green Lantern comment - because everyone loves an in-joke - right?) 

The artwork is totally NICE. Full of bright and evil pinks, burning intense yellows and ocean-deep blues and greens. But I'll admit now that I didn't manage to make it all the way to the end. Because as much as I wanted to get into it and have myself get entertained. I dunno - after a while it all just felt a little bit like wackiness for wackinesses sake - and the threads that were supposed to hold the story together all just started to feel weak and arbitrary: like with every bit of new info you find out - instead of making the story tie more together - it kinda made it feel like it was actually just falling apart (but then I didn't reach the end - so what do I know?) 

..................................................................................................................................................
[1] And you know - woo synchronicity and all that - because if there was one year that The Invisibles was all  about it was 2012.

[2] Wow. Look at that - I'm amazing. I should write comics!

..................................................................................................................................................
Links: Comics Journal Review of Xombi #1, Graphic Novel Reporter ReviewGuerrilla Geek Review, Good Comic Books Interview with John Rozum.

Further reading: The Invisibles, The Bulletproof Coffin, The Unwritten, Chew, iZombie, Batman: Batman and RobinAetheric Mechanics.

All comments welcome.

Thursday, 12 July 2012

Books: Ultimate Comics: Doomsday

_________________________________________________________________________________

Ultimate Comics: Doomsday
Written by Brian Michael Bendis
Art by Rafa Sandoval
2011




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


I'm just gonna admit it. I'm not ashamed. Ultimate Marvel. The Ultimate Universe. Ultimate Comics. Whatever you want to call them - I'm a fan. They're good. I like them.

For those of you who don't know what I'm talking about ("Ultimate what now?") read this footnote [1]: and as for the rest of you: well - I'll admit that I don't really know what the general critical consenus is - am I preaching to the choir (Sing it with me! Ultimate Marvel! Testify! Can I get a hallelujah?! Hallelujah!!! Amen!) or is this one of those things were I'm standing alone in an empty field with everyone else (in the field next door I guess - the one marked "We all hate Ultimate Marvel") staring at me like I'm crazy (see also: Garth Ennis' Crossed which - damn it - I don't care what any of you say - is one of the best horror comic books ever written)? For me the Ultimate Marvel books feels something that most of us comic book geeks should be getting behind - and yeah - I'll say it: celebrating. I mean - ok - I'm not totally bonkers - I'm not going to stand up for Jeph Loeb's Ultimatum [2] but out of all the superhero books and different types of series out there - the Ultimate books are (with a few exceptions) the ones that my brain has to make the least excuses for - and - yay - the ones I enjoy the most.

It was something that I couldn't really put my finger on until I got to this - Ultimate Doomsday (which seems to me to be Bendis' attempt to redo Ultimatum - but this time make it good and not suck). Because the thing that I really love about Ultimate Marvel (and the thing that it does best) is embracing the principles of change.

Back when these books first started - with Ultimate Spider-Man and Ultimate Fantastic Four (which please please please - if you're thinking of reading this book I would recommend you go and check out beforehand - for the simple reason that you will end up enjoying Ultimate Doomsday so much more - and it'll make it a richer experience and blah blah blah - not to mention that Ultimate Spider-Man and Ultimate Fantastic Four are both awesome and fantastic superhero books) - it was all about rebooting the famous Marvel properties [3] and making them fresh for a 21st Century audience without the need to be boggled down in countless years of back issues and whatever. But what the writers (most notably Brian Michael Bendis and Mark Millar) discovered is that rebooting the characters also gave you a chance to remake them and have them do different things. So - you didn't have to make Bruce Banner be a noble genius scientist with dashing good looks - no - you could make him a snivelling little nerd with personal hygiene problems (and if you like the sound of that: go read The Ultimates - don't worry - you can thank me later). And if you could make the characters different - you could also make the things that happen to the characters different as well... (and the best example of that - is that they killed Spider-Man and replaced him with someone new).

Because yeah - I know - we all know - that the worldwide famous superheroes with all the movies and the books and the tie-ins and whatnots can't be allowed to change too drastically. Peter Parker (whether he's played by Tobey Maguire or Andrew Garfield) is always going to be a white [4] middle-class smart wise-mouth teenager and blah blah blah: with nothing being allowed to rock the boat too much. And - well - for me at least - a really great story is always going to involve a lot of boat-rocking (because you know - changing the status quo is what a story is about really: it's almost the simplest possible defintion of what a story is - things are one way and then they change). Best example of this - compare the two versions of the Fantastic Four. In the normal Marvel universe the big change is that they killed Johnny Storm - but yeah - we'll know he'll be back - and that eventually (when Jonathan Hickman - the current writer - leaves) things will just go back to how they were before. There's a form of change - but it's more about moving the pieces on a chess board rather than doing anything irrevocable [5]. And then - well - if you read this book you'll notice right from the start that things between Marvel's First Family have developed well beyond the point of no return so that - well - so that things are no longer revocable (that is a word right?).

The metaphor that's sitting in my head that I want to use to try and describe how reading Ultimate Doomsday  feels (and of all the Ultimate books - for me - it's the one that goes furthest in terms of striking out and becoming it's own thing - but also (for that kinda of stuff) I'd say you should also read Ultimate Comics: Avengers) is that it's a bit like watching (which I guess in a way it is - so not much of a metaphor then - more a description - ha) a little miniature world that you already know works out one way (am thinking Lisa Simpson and The Genesis Tub) - rewinding it - and then watching things - well - I guess the best word would be mutate - in a whole new way. And while the mainstream Marvel Universe (for me) feels like reading the exploits of something that died a long long time ago (which I guess explains the success of Marvel Zombies): Ultimate Doomsday feels like something that's actually alive.

Just to you know: it's not a perfect book - like all superhero things it would be a lot better if it got over it's need to have everyone always fighting all the time - and the ending (after the massive grand build-up) feels a little of a meh. And after reading too many of these types of things I've gotta admit there is an element of "Epic Fatigue" ("This time things are as bad as they can possibly get"! "No wait - now it's the worst things can ever get!" "Oops - wait - ah - here we go: this is it!" "This is the epic climax bigger than anything else ever! No hang about..." etc) And I kinda wish someone would let Bendis write something where there didn't have to be disasters and explosions every 10 pages - but I guess that's just what you have to sign up for when you read this stuff (and - hey - I'm sure the kids love it. Right kids?)

....................................................................................................................................................
[1] From wikipedia: "Ultimate Marvel is an imprint of comic books published by Marvel Comics, featuring reimagined and updated versions of the company's superhero characters, including Spider-Man, the X-Men, the Avengers, and the Fantastic Four. The imprint was launched in 2000 with the publication of the series Ultimate Spider-Man and Ultimate X-Men. The characters have new origins, freeing them from the sometimes convoluted back-histories of the original versions. The universe has been designated as Earth-1610 within the Marvel Multiverse, which comprises an infinite number of alternate universes."

[2] It could have been Ultimate Marvel's finest moment - when superhero stories do the end of the world stuff it's always set outside continuity (see: The Dark Knight Returns, Kingdom Come or (if you really have to), Marvel Universe vs. The Punisher) - but here was an event that killed off a whole bunch of superheroes and wiped out New York (for a while at least) and - basically - did the whole apocalypse thing but (for whatever reasons) was unreadible (I mean - I love the idea - but don't think I've ever actually managed to read the whole thing all the way through - and man: what with comics being so damn easy to read - that's a pretty big indictment). And I'm not the only one: everyone thought Ultimatum sucked. (Another cut and paste from wikipedia: "Despite strong sales, Ultimatum received intensely negative reviews since its conclusion. IGN's Jesse Schedeen gave the series' final issue a scathing review, saying, "Ultimatum is one of the worst comics I have ever read," [Ouch!] and called it "the ultimate nightmare." [Which is actually the name of one of the books in Warren Ellis' Ultimate Galactus Trilogy - but whatever] Points of criticism among these reviews included the level of graphic violence, which included cannibalism, and the notion that the series was sold on the basis of its shock value, with some reviews also singling out Loeb's dialogue, characterization and storytelling [which - damn - is pretty everything - no?], others asserting the story's lack of originality." [And man - having a go at a superhero comic for a lack of originality means you know that it must be really really awful])

[3] Sorry - characters. Silly me.

[4] Sorry Donald Glover.

[5] Oh - sorry - in case you didn't know - death isn't really such a big thing in superhero comics anymore.

....................................................................................................................................................
Links: The M0vie Blog Review, Comics On The Ration Review.

Further reading: Ultimate Fantastic Four, Ultimate Spider-Man, Ultimate Comics: Spider-ManUltimate Comics: Spider-Man: Death of Spider-ManUltimate Galactus Trilogy, Ultimate Comics: Avengers.

Profiles: Brian Michael Bendis.

All comments welcome.

Monday, 9 July 2012

Books: Dan and Larry in Don't Do That!

________________________________________________________________________________

Dan and Larry in Don't Do That!
By David Charles Cooper
2002





Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


So I was working at Mildmay Library and - when there was a bit of free time - I checked their graphic novel stock to see if there was anything I could nab for the good folks at the Comic Forum and I saw this - Dan and Larry in Don't Do That! It was a slim volume with crazy-looking black and white artwork that kinda reminded me of the hyper-berserk-weirdness of Ren and Stimpy [1] which I guess is both a good thing and a bad thing [2].

I kinda let it sit on the side for a while - until - eventually - stuck with nothing else to read - I decided to pick it up. And well - It's a very slim little book that only took about 15 minutes to get through. And for most of my time reading it I struggled to see what the point was. At the time I was a little worried that I had never even heard of "Dan and Larry" and thought that maybe it was part of a wider thing - maybe there was a TV show that I didn't know about that it was connected to? Or maybe there were more books that preceded this that I needed to have read in order to get what was going on? But no - checking things out afterwards it seems that the title is deliberately misleading and that (well - so far at least) there are no other Dan and Larry books out there. 

The other thing that sorta tickled the edges of my brain was that - even tho everything takes place in a mutant world where the main character is a duck and the other guy has this big oozy mushroom head: there was this certain - I dunno - aspect to it that made it seem like it wasn't just a bunch of crazy cartoon adventures. Of course it was at that point that flicked to look at the cover and saw the little subheading: "A surreal mixture of dreams and memories." at which point I was like - oh - right. Because yeah - judged as little mini-adventure of two best friends - well - there's loads of pieces that don't quite fit and all these strange sort of tangents that go nowhere - but when you look at it and realise that it's bits of someone's life that they've refashioned into a new shape (with a bunch of dream imagery mixed in) then - yeah - it takes on a new dimension and becomes a lot more powerful and - frankly - disturbing. And by the time it ended I felt like I'd been dragged all the way through the tubes and guts of this guy's unconscious mind and learnt a few things that most people like to keep hidden away. 

Make no mistake: It's a very harsh and unforgiving book: one review (the Christian Perring, Ph.D metapsychology one below) says: "This work will certainly appeal to a good number of deviants." (and I can't tell if he's joking when he says: "It goes without saying that most right-thinking Americans will view this artwork as typical of the odious creations of countercultural slackers, and it is no surprise to learn that the artist lives in Canada."): normally the stuff I like to read is clear and to-the-point - and this is muddled and woozy: like when you full asleep on a hot sunny day while you're still wearing all your clothes - it's certainly different: but that doesn't mean that I wouldn't recommend it. 

..........................................................................................................................................
[1] Man. Ren and Stimpy (Brrrrrr!). I was just a kid when they first started showing Ren and Stimpy on TV (wow - all the way back in 1991) and even tho I watched every episode and used to hang around the next day in the playground quoting the best bits with my friends ("Don't whiz on the electric fence!") I don't know if I could say that I ever really enjoyed watching it - it was all so strange and surreal with all these unpalatable undertones and extreme gross-out close-ups and an all pervasive sense of loneliness and desperation and despair - that it was more like something I forced myself to undergo (for whatever now unknown reasons) - with the unintended effect of giving myself (no doubt) somesort of deeply buried permanent psychological damage (or as me and my friends like to say in a semi-wistful fashion when we watch some kind of crazy action film/french spooky thriller/or whatever where the characters encounter intense and crazy situations: "man - years of therapy.": (as in - (random example) you think that Home Alone's Kevin McCallister is going to live a peaceful little picket-fence life once that film (yes and the sequel) is over? No way. There's gonna be all sorts of abandonment issues and problems with aggresion and physical violence that he's going to have to spend his whole life working out with a shrink ("And then I made the blowtorch go on his head - I can still smell the burning flesh every time I close my eyes. Oh god. Every time I close my eyes." "Huh huh. I see. And how does that make you feel?")): so yeah - Ren and Stimpy - years of therapy).  

[2]  "Take this object, but beware it carries a terrible curse!" "Ooh, that's bad." "But it comes with a free frogurt!" "That's good." "The frogurt is also cursed." "That's bad." "But you get your choice of toppings." "That's good!" "The toppings contain potassium benzoate."

..........................................................................................................................................
Links: Metapsychology Review, Revolution Science Fiction Review, Canada.Com Interview.

Further reading: Black Hole, The Tale of One Bad Rat, David Boring.

All comments welcome

Wednesday, 4 July 2012

Books: Judge Anderson: Satan

_________________________________________________________________________________

Judge Anderson: Satan
Written by Alan Grant
Art by Arther Ranson
1996




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


So yeah: there's a trailer out for the new Dredd film [1] and so I thought it would be a good idea to get some Judge Dredd related content up on here seeing how I'm a 2000ad kid from way back and Judge Dredd is totally zarjaz.

Only - there's not all that much collected Judge Dredd stuff that we have in Islington that's that good. Yes we do have a few volumes of Judge Dredd: The Complete Case Files (and I guess I should make a post about them on here before the film comes out) - but the problem for me with those is that it's not a complete set which means that it feels a little untidy to (yeah - ok - I's got issues but whatever). But then again: well - then again - there's Judge Anderson: Satan. Which is complete (you can read it from start to end and there's not anything left out) and - with Arthur Ranson at the art controls (who some of you may recognise as that guy who drew the first three volumes of Button Man) - it is one of the most exquisite Judge Dredd (well - Judge Dredd-related) books out there (and - hey - Olivia Thirlby plays Judge Anderson in the Dredd film - so it all ties in).

Orginally based - lookswise - on Debbie Harry (because hey - this was way back in 1980) Judge Anderson is the bleeding-heart liberal type set up to constrast to Joe Dredd's special blend of fascist tendencies and punching people in the face. In fact Judge Anderson (first name: Cassandra [2]) is so touchy-feely and empathic she's actually psychic (and is a leading member of Mega City One's Psi-Division [4]: which is like the B.P.R.D. only everyone's a Judge - wait: you all know who the Judges are right?). So obviously - the best thing to do with someone who thinks that there's good inside everyone and who never met a non-violent solution that didn't appeal - the best thing to do with someone like that is to set them against Satan - the original bad boy.  

With a suitable apocalyptic bent (love those panels with all the people's faces [5]) and lots of cool speechifying (it's true what they say - the devil does get all the best lines): this is a good place to start a Judge Dredd obsession - the way Arthur Ransom draws things it feels like the Mega City One is real enough to live in and all he's doing is drawing the things he sees. The ending is a little abrupt yes (everytime I read it it kinda captures me by surprise and I'm all like: erm. huh? what?) but yeah the artwork (and those awesome splash pages!) means that I'm pretty forgiving - it's all so immersive and tactile - and his almost water-colour-type colouring (Is it water-colours? I've gotta confess have no real idea) makes it a vision of the future that you just don't ever really see (normally we prefer our futures black and bleak and bold): this is less Blade Runner and more like - if you had to compare to it to film -  Tarkovsky's Solaris [6]: a bit muted and a bit washed out but still with a sharp bite to beware of. 

...................................................................................................................................................
[1] Which so far seems to be staking it's claims to goodness purely on the fact that Karl Urban won't be taking his helmet off at all. Quote: ""It's going to be much more gritty, much more real - the environment, Mega City One, is going to feel like a real city. It's not going to feel like a Hollywood back-lot. There will be no gold cod-pieces, and we're definitely going to stay faithful to the way that the character was originally conceived and written. He'll keep helmet on."(As if all the sins of Sylvester Stallone 1995 could be absolved if  he just kept his helmet on- rather than the fact that it's such a bad movie because: it's such a bad movie) In facts: Film Crit Hulk wrote a very good essay called HULK ESSAY YOUR ASS: TANGIBLE DETAILS AND THE NATURE OF CRITICISM which you may want to read at some point now. And also: it's written by Alex Garland (who writes amazing openings for films: (see: 28 Days Later and Sunshine) - but never met an ending that he couldn't screw up completely (see: *ahem* 28 Days Later and Sunshine)) and directed by Pete Travis who made Vantage Point (which is so forgetful that I can barely remember watching it - altho I am pretty certain that it was totally rubbish) so - no - I'm not getting my hopes up that high even tho: the idea of a Judge Dredd movie is amazing and hopefully someday someone will make one? And if anyone is accepting pitches - then may I say that there's a Judge Dredd arc called The Graveyard Shift which would be perfect place to base things on. 

[2] Because if there's one thing 2000AD is good at - it's subtle writing. [3]

[3] And now you know enough to get the reference in this joke from Spaced: 

Daisy: "So who was this girl then?" 

Tim: "Her name was Cassandra, she was a psychic, she gave me her phone number..." 

[hands Daisy a piece of paper]

Daisy: "That's OUR phone number." 

Tim: "Man, she's good." 

[4] Oh man - tell me that you can read this without thinking that this all just sounds so amazing: "Like the rest of the Justice Department, Psi-Division contains several smaller sub-divisions. These include the Exorcist Judges, who deal with exorcising demonic activity; the Department of Magic who were tasked with examining magic and how best to judge it; and the Dream Police." (The "Dream Police"? Ha - See [2]) 

[5] In fact the panels of lots of people's faces getting smaller and smaller is a bit of a comics staple by now (didn't Frank Miller's Holy Terror do something very similar?): I wonder what person did it first? 

[6] It's normally a pretty wanky thing to do to mention Solaris (and damn it hand on heart - I prefer the Soderbergh version) - but (sorry) it's the only comparsion that comes to mind.

...................................................................................................................................................
Links: 2000AD Review with Arthur Ranson.

Further reading: MazeworldButton Man, The Batman/Judge Dredd Files, The Ballad of Halo Jones.

All comments welcome.

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

Books: Batman: Knightfall

_________________________________________________________________________________

Batman: Knightfall
Volume 1
Written by Doug Moench, Chuck Dixon and Alan Grant
Art by Various
2012



Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/

Batman: Knightfall
Volume 2: Knightquest
Written by Doug Moench, Chuck Dixon and Alan Grant
Art by Various
2012



Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/

Batman: Knightfall
Volume 3: Knightsend
Written by Dennis O'Neil, Doug Moench, Chuck Dixon and Alan Grant
Art by Various
2012



Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


Yes. This is the comic that first introduced Bane. Yes. That's the guy in The Dark Knight Rises played by Tom Hardy. Yes. That's the one with the mask over his face who says stuff like: "When Gotham is ashes you have my permission to die." (but sounds more like: "gmrrhahgahahamisashesmrrhahrraggrahtodie") and Yes. For a certain species of Batman fan that makes it the best Batman epic ever (check the nice Sean T Collins review below for a taste). And yes. Just like you I was itching to read it as soon as I saw it sitting on our shelves even tho I knew I knew that it was going to somewhat - well - bloated and long (640 pages!) and disappointing.

But - hey - I don't wanna sound too much like a trendy comics hipster (is there such a thing?) but me and Bane go way back. I mean - I know it's something that people don't really like to mention in polite society - but who remembers watching Batman and Robin (the film not the Grant Morrison comic)? You know - the 1997 one directed by Joel Schumacher (one of the few famous Joel's out there alongside: Joel McHale, Joel Coen, and - altho I don't know if this really counts - Billy Joel?): George Clooney and his batnipples, Chris O'Donnell as Robin (and wow - whatever happened to him?), Uma Thurman as Posion Ivy (who followed up that by playing Emma Peel in The Avengers Movie (no - not those Avengers) for which she recieved a Razzle as worst actress - so I guess it just wasn't her year) and Arnie Schwarzenegger as Mr Freeze who - damnit - manages to be a strange sort of amazing [1]: I mean - this is a film that is remembered (if at all) for torpedoing the Bat-franchise for eight frigging years (until Nolan swooped down and did Batman Begins [2]) but for me (one of those muggins stupid enough to go and see it at the cinema) the bitterest disappointment of the whole film (which as you can tell from that little list above is really saying something) was how they depicted Bane. Oh yeah - that's right - I'm not sure how many people even remember but (for some godforsaken reason) they decided to give Posion Ivy and for some unknown reason (why guys why???) they decided to make it Bane. (Wikipedia quote: "originally a diminutive criminal named Antonio Diego. Transformed into a hugely powerful "Super-soldier" by the strength-enhancing drug "Venom", he was seen assisting the main villains in several ways, including getting Mr. Freeze's suit back from Arkham Asylum, and fighting against the main heroes several times, eventually being defeated by Robin and Batgirl after they found a way to stop the venom flow to his brain.")

Now - sometime that year (or maybe a bit before) I had read Batman: Vengeance of Bane #1 (the opening story in this book) in some collected Dark Knight magazine or something [3] and I thought it was the best thing ever (or at least the best Batman story that I had ever read that wasn't done by Frank Miller - yeah that's right I knew my apples (and comics creators) even way back then). I mean - this story was hands-down the best origin story of any Batman villian ever (even better than Alan Moore's and Brian Bolland's The Killing Joke yeah) - hell: it might just be the best origin story of any superhero character ever (and reading it the second time I was struck by how - if you didn't know what was coming - you could almost think that you were reading the making of hero instead of a villain). It's got meance - a great sense of place (which is pretty hardcore right from the start with small glimpse of a dark and dingy torture scene) and the narration manages to hit that lovely sweet place between being dramatic and wise without slipping over into portentousness (which is a trap early Alan Moore often struggles with): plus (which I think is a must for all good origin stories) it's got lots of stuff of human endurance being pushed to it's limits and then - being pushed way way way past them. Trust me - once you read this story you'll understand what a colossal waste it was to have Bane relegated to a background role was [4]. It was like watching a film with The Terminator in but only using him as a clothes-hanger - all that potential just... squandered.

So - yeah - another big screen shot for Bane? Bring it on.

Unfortunatly - there's a sense in which the rest of Knightfall is also a bit of a... well - a bit of a Batman and Robin.

I'm not sure how many people reading this already know the story of Knightfall - but for me and my cultural standpoint - it feels a bit like one of those stories that everyone already knows (through cultural osmosis or whatever) [5]- but I don't want to spoil it for anyone that doesn't already know the full story [6]. Suffice to say: Bane decides (pretty much on a whim - kinda like: "I don't have nothing to do with my life. I wonder what I could do to challenge myself? What's that? There's a guy in some city who likes to dress up as a Bat? Right then - I'm going to make it my mission to destory him completely."[7]) to break Batman and does so in such a way that - well - this is a big thick book for a reason.

The thing that makes the whole thing a bit of a grind as opposed to something that's actually - oh - I dunno - fun to read is the artwork which - frankly - is almost uniformly dismal. I remember at my old local library in South London back when I was a kid that there was a copy of Knightfall and I never managed to get through the whole thing because - damn it - the art was just so bad (and hey - why bother with that stuff that feels cheap and nasty when there's all those comic books with Frank Miller's name across them) and it seemed that growing up and travelling from place-to-place there was always a copy of one of the three Knightfall books knocking around in whatever library I ended up in - which just made it seem like one of those Batman books that was so cheap (yet so thick) that everyone could have a copy (although the problem for every other collected version of Knightfall up until this one is that they didn't include Batman: Vengeance of Bane #1 which I know realise is the best bit by far) and now that I come to actual read the stupid thing. Urg. Mainstream comics have tended to get a lot prettier has time as gone on (Matt Fraction and Salvador Larroca's The Invincible Iron Man comes to mind) but man - the early days of the 1990s sure looked like a sucky time to be a Batman fan. Every page looks like it took about 10 minutes to draw and the colour palate seems malnourished (it's like they filled everything in with crayon - but there were only 10 colours left in the box so they just had to make do - or is it just that everyone in Gotham owns the same pair of pyjamas?). And - man - this whole thing is supposed to be a major epic - but (and I guess this is a problem with all mainstream comics) but they keep making (small) references to other stuff that's happened before (and you can work it out - but still): so it feels a little - incomplete (and if you're wondering who that blonde guy with the glasses is (huh? Jean-Paul Valley?- then you should maybe read Sword of Azrael before you start). 

(I gave up after the first book - but (so you know) there is Knightfall 2: Knightquest if you're interested - and hopefully at some point soon - the third part too...)

..................................................................................................................................................
[1] And hey: if you want to give yourself something to smile about then please enjoy this montage of Mr Freeze's puns.

[2] Fun fact that I have only just learnt: but the producers of Batman and Robin were "so impressed with the dalies" (man - producers are stoopid) that they wanted to make a 1999 sequel called Batman Triumphant. The script had "the Scarecrow as the main villain. The Joker would return as a hallucination in Batman's mind caused by the Scarecrow's fear toxin. Harley Quinn appeared as a supporting character, written as the Joker's daughter trying to get revenge on Batman for the Joker's death. George Clooney, Chris O'Donnell and Alicia Silverstone were set to reprise the roles of Batman, Robin and Batgirl, it was unknown who would play the Scarecrow or Harley Quinn but Howard Stern, Nicolas Cage, Steve Buscemi, Ewan McGregor or Jeff Goldblum were suggestions for the role, Madonna could have been the choice for Harley Quinn but an actress wasn't hired, and Jack Nicholson was to reprise his role from the Tim Burton film." Unfortunatly when Batman and Robin came out and practically everyone in the whole world hated it then junked it. Oh well.

[3] Legends of the Dark Knight maybe? Something like that. I dunno - it didn't have this amazing Glenn Farby cover so it must have been a reprint of somekind or another - but whatever.

[4] Just to remind those of you who've grown up in an age where it seems almost natural to reboot the Spider-Man films only a few years apart: way back in the 1990s the feeling was that characters only ever got one chance on big-screen representation.

[5] "Wait a minute... Statue of Liberty...? That was our planet!"

[6] And if you do know the full story and fancy a little recap then I very much recommend COOKING WITH COMICS: Knightfall. (it's reenactment of the whole Knightfall thing and is pretty damns funny). There's also one they did for The Death and Return of Superman which is somehow even better.

[7] And hell - I mock - but that's kinda one of the most satisfying Batman villain character motivations I can think of. Bane's like the George Mallory of Batman Batman Rogues Gallery ("and why do you want to kill Batman?" "Because he's there.")

..................................................................................................................................................
Links: Sean T Collins Review, Comics Alliance Article: Breaking Down Bane, Mindless Ones Article: Rogue’s Review #4: Bane.

Further reading: Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Batman: Batman and Son, Gotham Central, Batman: Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth, Batman: Sword of Azrael.

All comments welcome.

Books: Alan Moore: Storyteller

_________________________________________________________________________________

Alan Moore: Storyteller
Written by Gary Spencer Millidge
2011





Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


My librarian super skills are - honed as they have been throughout my long years of service - pretty amazingly awesome. I don't get to see the lists of new stuff that we get added to stock - but I know my way around the catalogue well enough (and all it's various secret ins-and-outs) to be able to find out when we get new stuff in (and what stuff to obtain for the Comic Forum): but then - once every so often in a blue moon - I get blind-sided.  So - guy comes into the library to return some stuff (namely a bunch of Batman books) and I'm happily discharging them - and then - what the what? - I'm greeted by Alan Moore's big, goregous beardy face looking up at him from a hefty lovely-looking hardback. 

A book all about the wonders of Alan Moore?! Why did I not know about this?

So - I slipped it into my comic pile and spent the rest of the day waiting and waiting and waiting for a chance to take it home and read it properly. Of course when I did get it home and opened it up I realised the totally obvious: just because it has Alan Moore's name (and sexy face) on it - doesn't mean it's actually - duh - written by Alan Moore [1] and - double duh - it doesn't mean that reading it is going to be as much fun and as much - erm - exciting - as reading an actual Alan Moore book [2]. Because all this is (not that it's all that bad - and I did manage to make my way through most of it): is a cut and paste of top Alan Moore quotes (sample: Talking about comic audience: "It's not my job to work out what they want, it's my job to tell them what they want.") - put into chronological order with a few added bits of background detail (ooh - old family photos! And - speaking frankly - I was astounded to find out that Alan Moore didn't have his beard when he was a teenager - oh well - another illusion shattered). 

There was a point long ago (back when - no joke - I worked in a mental hospital library) that I got to spend all day surfing around the internet (man that was a good/totally boring job). One day I found a website that had complied every single Alan Moore interview and put them all in the same place (it's now sadly defunct  which just seems totally unfair - isn't everything on the internet supposed to last forever?) and I spent a good few happy weeks making my way through (I think that I should have gotten some sort of Alan Moore degree at the end - like a graduation cap with bushy  beard attached maybe): so a lot of the stuff in this book I've already read (another sample: "Life isn’t divided into genres. It’s a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel … with a bit of pornography if you're lucky.") but regardless of whether or not you like the comics (altho - damnit - if you're a comic fan then there must be some Alan Moore somewhere for you to enjoy) the guy is brilliant conversationalist - and even if you're not getting the full interviews - his charm and warmth and intelligence still shines through. And I will admit that there were a few surprises hidden within (why have I never heard of The Bojeffries Saga until now? And - more importantly - why is not a collected edition that I can buy/get for the library??)  

If you're just a newbie to the wondrous world of Moore then this is a pretty good place to start - it'll introduce you to all the basics and will help you get an idea of what he's done and what's worth checking out - and for those of you who are more advanced in your comics appreciation there's lots of nice trips down memory lane and a chance to remind yourself of things you may have missed (altho I did reserve a copy of Captain Britain after reading the glowing recommendations and - urg - let me tell: it's not worth it).

.......................................................................................................................................
[1] And is it just me (yeah it's probably just me): but it somehow seems oh-so-very apt that Alan Moore has people write books about him - while Grant Morrison (with Supergods) kinda has to write his own? It like says something (I dunno what) about how Alan Moore just writes his books and gets on with it - while Grant Morrison has to do a bit more of his self-mythologising himself... (and of course I'm sure that's not even true - I bet there's a ton of books written about Grant Morrison - but damnit - whatever: it would probably be a good idea of stop comparing them every chance I get - it's not really all that healthy and/or illuminating - more like trying to work out whose Dad could beat whatever other Dad: but yeah).

[2] By which I of course mean - comic book. Yes I have read Voice of the Fire and managed to get all the way through it (go me) - but I don't intend on reading Jerusalem (his next novel) when it finally comes out especially seeing how it's reportedly around 750,000 words long which make it longer than David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest which is (with all apologies to my more novelistically-inclined flatmate who thinks that Infinite Jest is the best book like ever) kinda the standard measuring size of novel's that are just too big for me to want to read (unless of course you know: Dark Tower).

.......................................................................................................................................
Links: Forbidden Planet Blog A-Sort-Of-Review, Independent Review, Bleeding Cool Review.

Further reading: Supergods, Men of Tomorrow: Geeks, Gangsters, and the Birth of the Comic Book.

Profiles: Alan Moore.

All comments welcome.

Monday, 2 July 2012

Books: Marvel Boy

________________________________________________________________________________

Marvel Boy
Written by Grant Morrison
Art by J. G. Jones
2001




Available now from Islington Libraries
You can reserve this item for free here:
http://www.library.islington.gov.uk/TalisPrism/


How can you not love a comic that starts with a multi-coloured computer voice warning: "Two hundred million parallel realities and counting!"?

So. I have been meaning to write about Marvel Boy for a long, long, long time now. I've had this blank saved un-published post run sorta sitting there in my blog posts drafts folder for - what? - over a year. But I've just never had enough - I dunno - get up-and-go to actually sit down and write it. Thinking about it I'd say a big part of that is the due to the formatting of all the copies we have in Islington (sorry Islington): there's another copy I've read where the first few pages are laid out in a different way [1] - so instead of opening with a double-page spread the first page just hits you by itself (which you can tell is what was originally intended by the way the picture of the spaceship extends over from page 2 to page 3 - and if what I'm saying isn't making much sense (sorry) then looking for the spaceship is probably the best way to understand what I'm talking about) and then (with the other copy I've read) the page that says "sole survivor" has a page next to it which is completely black which - all-in-all - makes the opening impact that much harder and makes the Islington copies seem a bit like - I dunno - a cheap copy: like watching a film someone's taped off the TV [2]. Of course once you get past those opening pages (altho - wait it does do it again much later with: "what's so funny" - but let's ignore that) and on to Noh-Varr striking his best Jesus Christ pose and "Hello Cruel World" plastered across the side - it's all the same - but - yeah - it's not so great when you reading something that fluffs the start just so that - what? - it can skimp on two pages - and I guess I've just been waiting for Islington to realise their heinous mistake and replace their cheap copies with the prestige format before I posted this post. But - shockingly - this hasn't happened (oh well).

But let's try and forget all that and start again: superhero comics for all their countercultural bluster are often fairly conservative when it comes the values that they represent - by which I mean to say: Superman, Batman, Spider-Man and all the rest often use their time and energy to try and preserve the status quo rather than attempting to upset it. The idea behind Marvel Boy (Grant Morrison: "We`re always being told that super hero books are nothing but adolescent power fantasies. Fine. Here comes the ultimate adolescent power fantasy!") is: wouldn't it be fun to have a comic where the guy [3] with the all superpowers was less Johnny Upstanding Moral Citizen Dedicated To Truth, Justice and The Betterment of All Races, Colours and Creeds and more - well - Johnny Rotten [4]: someone who just wants to smash stuff and who instead of seeing the masses of humanity as something worth protecting - sees them more as something to fight against? There's that little speech Michael Caine gives in The Dark Knight ("Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.") and while obviously we can all agree that that isn't the type of person that we would want to invite around for a polite little dinner party - it does sound like someone who it would be fun getting a few voyeuristic kicks from: because looking around at the apocalyptic entertainment we all like to spend our time on - alien invasions, zombies, nuclear war, etc - there's a part of all of us that just wants to watch the world burn [5]. 

Of course because it's Grant Morrison there's a little more to it than that - and for me - a big part of the thrill of reading Marvel Boy is the cool and crazy and outrageous ideas that he manages to drop in every other page - I don't want to sound too much like a drooling fanboy but there's stuff here that could be used to sustain a whole movie (altho: with the paucity of ideas in most modern movies that sounds more like a cuss than a compliment) but these guys squeeze all they can from it in just a few pages before they're moving on to the next thing: which left me feeling almost giddy the first time I read it. 

Also - after the ordeal of Mark Millar's Wanted (which is still number one in the "comics which left a nasty taste in my mouth" list) it's nice to see J. G. Jones using his powers for good instead of evil: there's a brilliant sharpness and clarity which he brings to all his artwork that makes taking him in as easy and pleasurable as drinking a cold glass of lemonade. 

........................................................................................................................................
[1] And just to be clear: when I say "different" I mean "better."

[2] For anyone that doesn't understand this reference: shut up and stop making me feeling old.  

[3] I guess "Marvel Girl" would have been a step too far. 

[4] Fun fact: The name Johnny Rotten apparently - and man what could possible be more English than this? - comes from the fact that John Lydon's teeth were so bad ("his lack of oral hygiene led to his teeth turning green").

[5] For me - the gold standard of this type of comic would be Alan Moore's D.R. and Quinch (first published in the year I was born) - where: not only are the two punkish leads evil teenage extraterrestrials - but they manage to beat 99% of all the other bad guys out there and blow up in the Earth in their first 6 page appearance (and it's not even like they were doing it on purpose either - rather it's just a revenge prank gone horribly right). But - yeah -basically you should read it.

........................................................................................................................................
Links: Graphic Content Article: The Future Is X-Rated: Marvel Boy, The Modern World And The History Of The Marvel Universe / Graphic Content Article: 28: Reconsidering Noh-Varr Post-Morrison, The Comics Reporter ReviewCollected Editions Review.

Further reading: The Authority, Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again, Batman: Year 100, JLA: Earth 2, Black Summer, The Boys, IrredeemableWanted, D.R. and Quinch, X-Men: New X-Men, The Avengers: The New Avengers: Illuminati.

Profiles: Grant Morrison.

All comments welcome.